Obama’s GDP -.01%? “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

Coach Is Right ^ | January 31st, 2013 | Derrick Hollenbeck

[IbJensen]

Just a day before we learned the GDP fell from + 3.2% (the fairy tale told to us before November’s election) to -.01%, for the last quarter of 2012, Louisiana Democrat Senator Mary Landrieu pronounced the Obama Administration’s wild spending “problem” something that was made up by Fox News. Landrieu is one of the head cheer leaders of a new breed of “in-your-face” Democrat who simply deny anything is wrong with our economy – or anything else in America for that matter. “Who are you going to believe; me or your lying eyes?” comes to mind.

She is joined by a growing number of liberal celebrities whose comments embody Hillary Clinton’s dismissive “What difference, at this point, does it make?” Halfwits like Paul Krugman smugly says the debt problem is “mostly solved.” Slate’s Matt Yglesias demands, “What sovereign debt crisis? There certainly isn’t one in the United States.”

Today these deniers have been exposed as the fools they are by the truth. They have been relying on a pack of lies from the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities which has insisted that a combination of economic growth, tax hikes and promised spending cuts have already provided a significant reduction of deficits.

This sounds great but it is the kind of nonsense the simpletons who vote Democrat believe. Here’s some truth. Michael Peterson, a non-partisan economist has a different view. His comments, published in The Hill (which is certainly not a right wing site), pointed out that the “fiscal cliff” agreement, “may have prevented the immediate threats that the fiscal cliff posed to our fragile economic recovery, but we haven’t remotely fixed the nation’s debt problem.” He added. “….our nation is still heading toward debt levels of 200 percent of GDP and beyond.”

DEBT LEVELS OF TWO HUNDRED PERCENT of GDP and beyond!

Hillary clear your throat and give us your campaign slogan, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

Sources:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/29/democratic-senator-says-spending-only-out-control-on-fox-news/

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/debt-deniers-fantasy

[IbJensen]

The term 'wench' could never be applied to Hillary who uttered the above famous non-excuse for incompetence. Something much more in tune to her remarkable personality and poised, concise delivery of all her comments. By the time she reaches the end of her drawn out sentences one forgets what the hell it is she is saying, or for that matter what day it is. But, never fear, she is the smartest woman in the world who single handedly has made an even grater muddled mess out of what passes for foreign policy that any of her fellow nit witted predecesors.

Oh, I almost forgot. The term that could be applied to this chubby little cutie would be _itch. (You can chose either a W or a B)

When, during the next four-years that will drag on and seem a lifetime with most of us in agony, will the plug be pulled on this phony, sociopathic, narcissist halfrican?

[Aetius]

I hope Louisianan Republicans have someone good to run against Landrieu.

[Cringing Negativism Network]

We need to return American industry.

We need American exports.

We are destroying our own nation trading one-way (inbound only) with China.

[justrepublican]

“What difference, at this point, does it make?” needs to be firmly attached to the _itch.

The halfricken american would rather submit a phony document to stroke his ego.IE/birth certificate/skeet shoot photo/books/Greek columns

That being said, the quote could well be applied to the Democratics party.

[IbJensen]

Baby Cheeks is a Landrieu. She’ll be a leftist senator for life. She was one of Billy Goat’s favorites.