Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius

The former Pennsylvania Railroad section of the Northeast Corridor is electrified with 11,000 volt 25 Hz, as are the former Reading commuter lines. I need to check the historical basis for the lower frequency. Apparently it was a combination of transmission losses, and being able to operate “universl motors” that could operate on DC.
The 17 Hz is actually 16 2/3 Hz of the Deutsche Bahn (1/3 of 50 Hz).
Those are old legacy systems


34 posted on 02/01/2013 8:42:26 PM PST by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is the operational wing of CPUSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Hayek
Thank you.

In 1997, I read Michael Bezilla's The Electrification of the Pennsylvania Railroad, and now it's out of print. I was going from a failing memory.

35 posted on 02/01/2013 8:45:19 PM PST by Publius ("A centralized government is a centralized evil." -- Gen. John Graham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Hayek

Yeah that’s mostly my understanding (see previous post.) With AC you could mitigate the huge transmission loss you get with direct current, but as you increased the frequency you start to have higher and higher inductance losses in the windings of a DC motor. 60 Hz was too high for those motors. 25 Hz was a trade-off point between internal losses and line losses.


41 posted on 02/01/2013 8:57:34 PM PST by FredZarguna (Father of our Country Facepalm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson