Posted on 01/31/2013 3:35:08 PM PST by SMGFan
Of course it’s a smear campaign. Thing is Bob Menendez himself is behind the smear as a way to enhance his resume among Dems for bigger things down the road.
Answer: No.
Comment: He is a politician and thus is far more vice ridden than any known classification of occupations. Any sane person knows that politicians are vice addicts by definition.
Say yes only if you believe Jerry Sandusky was framed. (snort!)
Leni
He could’ve saved $60K and just drove to Camden.
The underage prostitute was the victim of a smear campaign.
Dunno. I don’t think so, but this was the Nazi party’s favorite way to smear opponents, and, at least for ‘Pubbies, just the accusation would be catastrophic...
I think Menendez is a smear on every American.
Let’s see, Senator Larry Craig ‘s toe-tapping was a legitimate news story while Menendez’s buying the use of poverty strickened girls to satisfy his lust is not a news story but a smear. I see now.
Yes 19.81% (102 votes)
No 80.19% (413 votes)
Total Votes: 515
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. (multiple votes using multiple internetz devices are allowed!) And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. (multiple votes using multiple internetz devices are allowed!) And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)
Of course it is a smear campaign. Those evil Republicans
and their legions of friends in the MSM are always trying
to smear defenseless Democrat politicians
“I don’t think that has been alleged”.
Actually, I read several articles and none of them mentioned the girls age. It did say the “escort” service was named “dolly” something or other. The articles also mentioned he liked the new, young ones... so at this point, couldn’t they have been little girls? (or were they young teens?)
I don’t care.
I’m surprised “no” is winning.
$58,500 for 2 sessions? That’s gotta’ be some perversion.
When the Post turns on a Democrat politician THAT IS NEWS!
No. My only surprise was that *female* prostitutes were involved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.