[Michael.SF.]

Also, not having a child is the most important thing I could do to reduce my carbon footprint,

Shame on all of us here for not supporting this woman and this wonderful thought!

Now, if we can just convince all the whack-job-libs of this, we would be on the right track.

do I really need a sarchasim tag?

[CitizenUSA]

Michael.SF.: “Now, if we can just convince all the whack-job-libs of this, we would be on the right track.”

I don’t know why you need a sarcasm tag. That sounds like smart thinking to me. We’re better off if more of these libs choose to be genetic Darwin award winners. I guess it hasn’t occurred to them that the future is owned by those who reproduce. If they truly wanted to save the environment, they’d have as many children as possible and indoctrinate them in the cause. Otherwise, who “speaks for the trees,” Lorax-like, in the future?