Since your description of “Uncle Chip’s” narrative doesn’t sound like anything I have heard or read anywhere, even in Uncle Chip’s posts, I simply cannot comment on it.
But if you are arguing that children didn’t escape Soto’s room, it is clear they did. At least one kid has said they did so while the gunman was shooting Soto.
if you are arguing that it is impossible that the kids ran down the street and ended up at Gene’s house, it seems most narratives say the kids were running down the street, and that would put them by Gene’s house.
The question is whether Gene came out and invited them in, and I see no way that the timeline of the shooting is related to that question.
If you are wondering why the “someone” was driving their car to the school already, I believe they were coming to school for a purpose, NOT because of the shooting, so that also doesn’t seem to shed any light on the timeline of the shooting.
I doubt Uncle Chip has ever suggested the gunman stood for 10 minutes in a room, as the entire timeline as presented by the 911 calls wouldn’t really support that, and I’ve not seen UC argue against the 911 timeline.
I also don’t understand your projection of animus against Uncle Chip.
As to your last point, while I speak only in conjecture, it is possible for kids to have gone to Gene’s house, and then have been taken to the police station. They are not mutually exclusive possibilities.
What WOULD be a mutually exclusive possibility would be a parent picking up their child at Gene’s, AND picking up the same child at the police station.
So, if you find one named child where Gene says that child was picked up by their parents, and then find the same child referenced as being picked up at the police station, that would be an excellent refutation of Gene’s story.
As I said, I don’t care about Gene’s story because it is sufficiently detailed that if it is a lie, that lie will be easily seen when the official reports come out.
Uncle Chip has warped his facts all over the place
Sometimes he claims that the police weren’t on scene when Lanza shot up Soto’s class.
Sometimes he claims they were there in 3 minutes.
Sometimes he claims that Lanza shot up Soto’s class, the kids left, had time to run down the road to be seen by his witness,.then the witness has to park her car, walk to the front of the building, talk to another mom - no cop cars present...it eerily quiet ...and then Lanza sees the cops shoots the dead kids and Soto again and then himself.
Don’t know how the cops got there since there are no cop cars at the time that witness said she was in front of the door.
NOT BELIEVABLE
Other times he claims they throughly searched the car in front of the school including trunk before they went inside to find Lanza shooting up the school- except his witness says nothing about any cop cars.
His stories are a mish mash depending on what he is trying to claim.
I have seen various video interviews by Robert Licata...father of the boy who escaped.
His group got picked up by someone as they were fleeing and went to the police station. They didn’t stop off at Creepy Gene’s for juice and playtime with the stuffed animals.
This narrative DOES NOT FIT with Creepy Gene.
No one backs up Creepy Gene’s story and he hasn’t released any names of the six who were in his house playing with his toys.
Oh, and the first officers on the scene say nothing about kids fleeing as they are rushing Lanza.
There is a lot here that doesn’t add up.
Time will tell MAYBE what went on...
but in the meantime, NOT ONE STORY IS BACKING CREEPY GENE.