Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 21twelve

The people who think Sandy Hook may be a fraud point to Gene Rosen. You really have to watch his interviews to understand how bizarre he is and how often his story changes.

I am not one that believes Sandy Hook didn’t happen.

I am one that believes there is a lot being hidden.

My personal opinion of Gene is that he is an attention whore who wanted to be on camera.

Watching him walk around on that helicopter footage is funny.

Whatever the case, his story doesn’t hold up.


60 posted on 01/30/2013 2:25:31 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick
“..there is a lot being hidden..”

I watched bits and pieces of some “conspiracy” video on the shooting. Lots of it can be explained by inaccurate first reporting. It was interesting though how my mind tended towards the “conspiracy”. I was wondering aloud to my wife what makes the human brain want to look at these big events (Assasinations, 911, Sandy Hook, etc.) as “conspiracies” is some type of protection method. Rather than looking at them as random attacks by some nutjob (which could happen to me or my kids), the idea of a conspiracy makes it somehow less random and less likely that it could happen to me?

And definitely some unanswered questions that may/may not be important. (The one that I wonder about is the guy seen running from the school and caught, and accounts of a guy cuffed and on the ground at the police station, then in the squad car). Perhaps it was just “some guy” that happened to be in the woods near the school at the time, and never warranted further response from the media.

But the media has definitely used this brutal attack to further their liberal agenda, and will use it to their full advantage. Including lying and omissions.

63 posted on 01/30/2013 2:41:56 PM PST by 21twelve ("We've got the guns, and we got the numbers" adapted and revised from Jim M.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

You are one who keeps suggesting that kids weren’t in the school. I still have no idea why, or what you are trying to get at.

But even in this thread, in which we are discussing an article where the police specifically talk about taking classrooms of kids out of the school and to the firehouse, you still bring up the principle and “700 kids” and wonder why we don’t see them.

Why? What is your point? Do you think that most of the kids were told to stay home? Do you think they all stayed in the school? Do you think they were all killed and so they didn’t leave the school? Or are you just raising “questions” so you can say you raised “questions”?

As I have said many times, questions are cheap. If the question doesn’t have a point, it’s just a waste of time.

So, let’s here it — what is your theory regarding the missing children?


64 posted on 01/30/2013 7:03:13 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson