Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: technically right

Folks, the DiFi bill wasn’t intended to “go anywhere”.

It was intended to be the most egregious piece of infringement possible in order to get you to accept the “compromise bill” that’s coming.


8 posted on 01/29/2013 12:46:29 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

maybe, but DiFi obsesses day and night about firearms. She wouldn’t pass a mental fitness test these days ~ no dealer would sell that nutcase a firearm.


9 posted on 01/29/2013 12:48:08 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MrB

Bingo!


12 posted on 01/29/2013 12:50:37 PM PST by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: MrB
It was intended to be the most egregious piece of infringement possible in order to get you to accept the “compromise bill” that’s coming.

This is the perspective we all need to start from and clearly state to any and all who will listen (Senators, Reps, NRA, etc.) that NO COMPROMISE is acceptable because it only encourages them to come back later. Everything about DiFi's bill is egregious and needs to go down in flames.

16 posted on 01/29/2013 12:54:17 PM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson