Contact San Francisco Council for badge requirements.
Posted on 01/29/2013 6:29:41 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
This list does NOT include "Honorary officers" or the "Advisory Council".
One or more of these executive members is behind the effort to put sodomites in charge of young boys.
Ping
given tax laws which have changed.
it is far too easy for the 98% of the population to not give money.
Why not just force the girl scouts to go coed and they can continue the recruiting over there.
I bet NEARLY EVERY FREEPER in the USA lives within 50 miles of one of these people.
How about a call or a letter or a friendly knock on the door?
Me ping too.
Link to a bio of the one nearest to me: http://bucherblog.blogspot.com/2005/07/steve-king.html
From what I’ve read, BSA Board members, Ernst & Young CEO Jim Turley and AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson are behind overturning the ban. It won’t hurt though, to put pressure on the other board members to tell Turley and Stephenson to take a long hike off a short pier!
You omitted the name Barak H. Obama, the titular head of the B.S.A.
Shame on them. We cut our family's ties with the entire program entirely for we will never support a program that attempts to claim the middle line morally.
When they seek that middle ground, they stand on nothing but the slide into perdition.
Me ping. You ping. We all ping. :)
BSA, now known as the “Boyfriends of Scouts: Adopt a Child For Your Tent Today!”
Not that I know of but it won't hurt contacting others on the board of BSA and requesting that they stand against this as it violates the Boy Scout code of being "morally straight". Why can't those CEO's recognize it? Perhaps they aren't morally straight!
question....
let’s say that they allow gays to become members, and one of them molests a fellow scout. what happens then?
let’s say thet they allow gays to become leaders, and one of them molests a scout. what happens then?
can you say “catholic priest scandal’?
Let’s not bash the BSA yet. they have not made a decision....yet. And as an Eagle Scout, i hope they do make the right decision and stick with the ban. If they don’t, i am going to be very angry.... But don’t bash them yet, i have written an e-mail, and hopefully along with everyone else’s letter, will make the difference.
As a present Committee Chairman of our local scout organization. And I am disappointed in this decision.
But, I think we all knew it was going to happen sooner or later. Just recently, the third largest chartering organization, the United Methodist Church, stopped all renewals of charters until this was changed.
If you know anything about Pack and Troop organization, you know that Packs and Troops are sunk without their yearly charter renewals.
It was either change this rule or completely revamp the structure of Districts, Councils and Packs/Troops.
Unfortunately, this is the easy way out.
Why is it the same folks who lambaste the Catholics’ scandal are 4-square behind this movement?
They have been getting an earful from the homosexual lobby, now it is our turn. I am a Scoutmaster. I am against the change in policy. It is a divide and conquer technique. As a whole the homosexual lobby has not been able to take down or effect change in the BSA, but with smaller separate charter organizations they will be easy targets. The CO’s can not support legal challenges, the money is not there. What will eventually be left are CO’s that accept homosexuality. Even if no homosexuals join, they have again pushed there agenda of normalizing their behavior into society.
They so wish this, even though deep in there soul they know they never will be.
BSA should not allow ‘’sexuals’’ of any kind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.