[bray]

Guess Wikopedia may want to take the Conodate out of their list: http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/archive/permalink/the_himalayan_fossils_hoax

This should be fun exposing the evolutionary frauds through the decades. But then again, you must be a evolutionary believing scientist to have an opinion on evolution. Otherwise you are just a Neanderthal and invalidated.

[stormer]

Why would Wikipedia want to take the conodont (not conodate) off their list? The hoax you've so cleverly used as evidence disputing the Theory of Evolution has nothing to do with the validity of the cladistics of conodonts, but only that someone was lying about the provenance of some fossils. And how was this fraud detected? Why through science, of course. By demonstrating that the geological setting claimed could not have produced those remains, evolutionary theory is strengthened, not weakened. Care to play again?