Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

Your answer is right there in the article:

“Of course, if the investigation reveals that there should be a criminal prosecution, then that prosecution would take precedence over any report,”

They can’t know if all those subject to prosecution are dead, until they finish the investigation.


31 posted on 01/25/2013 10:00:18 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

The Prosecution side of things seals up things for various reasons.

If Lanza is a lone wolf and they aren’t trying to cover something up then there should be no reason to extend the seal on the search warrants.

http://www.ctpost.com/policereports/article/Sandy-Hook-affidavits-remain-sealed-4150259.php

So what are they hiding

“Sedensky said in his applications that the affidavits contained information “not known to the general public” and that premature disclosure would “seriously jeopardize the outcome and success of the investigation” by “divulging sensitive and confidential information” known only to investigators.”


35 posted on 01/25/2013 10:24:24 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson