Communists Cheer On Obama's Gun Grab

The New American ^ | 24 January 2013 | William F. Jasper

[VitacoreVision]

No surprise that the Communist Party USA, plus official voices from Communist China and Russia, endorse Obama's latest attacks on the 2nd Amendment.

Communists Cheer On Obama’s Gun Grab

The New American
24 January 2013

It should come as no surprise that the Communist Party USA is on board with President Obama’s plan to attack Americans’ right to keep and bear arms as a means to “end gun violence.” A cardinal feature of communist regimes, like all dictatorships, is the prohibition of private ownership of arms, creating a monopoly of force in the hands of the State.

In a January 18 article, People’s World, an official publication of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), declared that “the ability to live free from the fear or threat of gun violence is a fundamental democratic right — one that far supercedes any so-called personal gun rights allegedly contained in the Second Amendment.”

The article, entitled, “Fight to end gun violence is key to defending democracy,” written by People’s World labor and politics reporter Rick Nagin, claims that “the right-wing extremists opposing all efforts to curb gun violence are the same forces that rallied behind Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, hoping to undermine every other democratic right as well as the living standards of workers and ordinary Americans.”

“It is for that reason,” declares Nagin, “as well as the need to protect public safety, that the same coalition of labor and its allies that worked so hard and effectively to re-elect President Barack Obama must now go all-out to back his common sense proposals for gun law reform.”

The Communist Party’s “journalist” continued:

As Obama has charged, the extremists recklessly "gin up fear" that the government is coming to take away hunting rifles and personal weapons owned for legitimate self-defense. Led by the hate-mongering leadership of the National Rifle Association, they use a totally fraudulent and only very recent interpretation of the Second Amendment which they falsely claim as necessary for protecting every other freedom contained in the Bill of Rights.

However, gun rights advocates don’t need to “gin up fear” that President Obama’s “common sense” proposals will lead to even more onerous infringements than the current calls to ban or restrict so-called “assault weapons”; the gun control zealots have been quite emphatic about intending to severely restrict (and many have called for a total ban on) all privately owned firearms. A December 21 article for the Daily Kos is one of the candid admissions against interest by the Left that the real end goal is a total monopoly of gun ownership by the government. Entitled, “How to Ban Guns: A step by step, long term process,” the regular Daily Kos writer “Sporks” says:

The only way we can truly be safe and prevent further gun violence is to ban civilian ownership of all guns. That means everything. No pistols, no revolvers, no semiautomatic or automatic rifles. No bolt action. No breaking actions or falling blocks. Nothing. This is the only thing that we can possibly do to keep our children safe from both mass murder and common street violence.

The writer then outlines the piecemeal plan by which the federal government can begin with registration and end up with confiscation. The Daily Kos article also cites the need to delegitimize hunting as well. “We should also segway [sic] into an anti-hunting campaign, like those in the UK,” it says. “By making hunting expensive and unpopular, we can make the transition to a gun free society much less of a headache for us.”

Nagin surely must know that it is not merely groundless paranoia exploited by “extremists” inspiring fear that President Obama’s multi-part gun control plan is but the opening wedge in a new drive for ever-expanding federal restrictions and infringements of the Second Amendment. And Nagin surely is aware that his comrades ruling China, Cuba, North Korea, Russia, and other communist countries have never stopped at partial restrictions on private ownership of weapons.

As The New American reported recently, Communist China's ruling mandarins, sounding very much like our own media commentators, have blasted the United States for our “rampant gun ownership.” A Chinese government report last year detailing alleged human rights violations in the United States declares:

The United States prioritizes the right to keep and bear arms over the protection of citizens' lives and personal security and exercises lax firearm possession control, causing rampant gun ownership.

More recently, on December 14, 2012, the Beijing regime’s Xinhua news agency editorialized:

Twenty-eight innocent people, including 20 primary students, have been slaughtered in a mass shooting at an elementary school in the U.S. state of Connecticut. Their blood and tears demand no delay for the U.S. gun control.

“Action speaks louder than words,” concluded the Xinhua editorial. “If Obama wants to take practical measures to control guns, he has to make preparation for a protracted war and considerable political cost.”

Communist China, of course, is no paragon of virtue when it comes to liberty, safety, and human rights. Its total ban on private ownership of guns under Mao Tse-tung (Zedong) guaranteed that the Communist Party would have unchallenged power. And, as Professor R. J. Rummel has pointed out in his several published studies on democide (mass murder by governments): Power kills and absolute power kills absolutely. In the case of Communist China, the mass murder by the communist government under Mao was somewhere in the neighborhood of 38 million souls!

And China remains a rigidly controlled police state to this day, notwithstanding the limited market reforms that the Party has allowed for pragmatic purposes to obtain the capital and technology it needs to modernize. Only Party officials and the police and military (who must be members of, and be vetted by, the Communist Party) are allowed to possess weapons.

Mao’s comrades in Russia, Vladimir Lenin and Josef Stalin, likewise disarmed the civilian population before initiating mass murder. As did Adolf Hitler and every other “successful” mass-murdering tyrant throughout history. Vladimir Gladkov, a radio propagandist on Vladimir Putin’s "Voice of Russia" program, expressed disappointment on December 20 that the Sandy Hook mass shooting probably would not generate the support President Obama needs to implement his desired gun controls. “Unfortunately, there are grounds for very serious doubt that even after this terrible massacre, a ban on selling weapons will be introduced in the US,” said Gladkov.

Again, considering that rigid, absolute, centralized power is the essence of all totalitarian regimes, those regimes must, therefore, automatically strike down all checks and balances that would limit their central authority. It is not surprising that spokesmen for these totalitarian governments would endorse policies that give the government a monopoly on deadly force.

The American Founding Fathers, on the other hand, recognized that the armed private citizen is the ultimate check and balance against the centralized monopoly of force which invariably turns tyrannical and deadly. Nagin and People’s World, not surprisingly, side with communist tyrants and deride American commitment to our natural rights enshrined in our Constitution.

“The Second Amendment is obsolete and now has been twisted to threaten the basic safety and security of all Americans,” says Nagin. Nagin, according to the profile provided on Keywiki by Trevor Loudon, has been a member of the CPUSA for several decades and a writer for the People’s World and other communist publications since 1970. He is a member of the Newspaper Guild and the Communications Workers of America as well as a political coordinator for the AFL-CIO in Ohio. In 2012 he was the Democratic Leader in Cleveland Ward 14 and served on the County Democratic Party Executive Committee.

We recognize the totalitarian ideology and objectives of Nagin and other communist propagandists when they advocate disarming of civilians and a total monopoly of force in government. Many of the other people advocating the same gun control policies may not have those totalitarian objectives in mind — but by their support of these policies they would lead us down the same deadly path nonetheless.

Related article:

Remembering the Mass-murderer Mao

[AngelesCrestHighway]

“No surprise that the Communist Party USA, plus official voices from Communist China and Russia, endorse Obama’s latest attacks on the 2nd Amendment.”...
Ha! Ha!...Not so fast you commie cow crap! The NRA is growing stronger every day.

[NFHale]

This, coming from the ideology which has murdered more human beings in the last century and a half than any other “ism”...

These jackwagons made the Nazis look like rank amateurs.

No surprise they’re cheering Jughead on...he’s totally sympatico.

[NFHale]

Reminds me of a song...

“teach your children well....”

[NFHale]

“...The NRA is growing stronger every day...”

In this sense, one might say that “NRA” now means “Newly Republicanized Americans”...

Just saying...

[servantboy777]

Don't cheer too loud Commies, if SHTF, you guys better get on outta town....quickly.

Just a lil advice. Brought to you by, Tea Party America.

[Still Thinking]

http://neveryetmelted.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Citizenshand_over_weapons.jpg

I found this one in Google images searching on “Soviet citizens give up weapons”. There’s a variety of versions of it, different sizes, some in color, etc. This one is probably the best.

[Still Thinking]

You can also always find out in your browser where an image is. In Firefox, right click on the image and choose “View Image Info” if you just want to check it or “Copy Image Location” to put the link in your clipboard to paste somewhere (like the FR post window for example). You can also save a copy of the image from that menu. Don’t know the steps in other browsers like Internet Destroyer or Chrome, but probably similar.

[Zionist Conspirator]

Well well well . . . it's official. The Communist Party USA is opposed to armed revolution in the United States.

Too bad Batista didn't have gun control in Cuba in the 1950's.

[AngelesCrestHighway]

That’s it...New Republic Americans

[Karliner]

Bolsheviks did the same. How many murdered between Lenin and Stalin, Kruschev?

[metmom]

Banning them is one thing. Collections are another ball game altogether.

Especially what with how gun sales have been going lately.

I'll bet there's a lot of reports of tragic boating accidents.

[itssme]

Better yet, show this communist web site to BOTH THE KIDS AND THE ADULTS, AND, AND THE FOLKS WHO VOTED SOCIALIST-DEMOCRATIC PARTY LAST ELECTION.

Show them this site and be prepared for what they might say, and straighten them out. By the way, the Democratic Party as we ONCE knew it, is now the Socialist-Democratic Party.

Communism wants to control people, own AND control all commerce.

Socialism wants to control people AND commerce, but NOT own commerce.

We are now under Socialist-Democratic Party rule. We need to control the language...no more will I call the Democratic Party by this name. Hereforth, I will call the Democratic Party the Socialist-Democratic Party, and I will contact Drudge, Mark Levin, Rush and any other conservative outlet and urge them to correct their language and call them the same.

We'll see what happens....

[skinkinthegrass]

"I will call the Democratic Party the Socialist-Democratic Party"Why stop there?
try Amerikan Socialist Workers' Independent Party (ASWIP :)...

[itssme]

Gotta make it simple for the masses....Socialist-Democratic Party of America.

[ought-six]

“It’s a war of attrition. Make the guns unavailable and we are unarmed.”

Then don’t let it get to that point.