To: Darnright
He could have been good if he just asked one question at a time and got some kind of answer. ONE QUESTION AT A TIME!
297 posted on
01/23/2013 8:27:11 AM PST by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: Red_Devil 232
He could have been good if he just asked one question at a time and got some kind of answer. ONE QUESTION AT A TIME! It's okay. Hopefully some in the House are researching those questions for followup in this afternoon's session.
304 posted on
01/23/2013 8:30:05 AM PST by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
To: Red_Devil 232
>He could have been good if he just asked one question at a time and got some kind of answer. ONE QUESTION AT A TIME!<
The problem with your idea is the very short time in which these individuals have to question Clinton.
Sen Paul needed to fire questions at her to get them on the record.
307 posted on
01/23/2013 8:31:50 AM PST by
Darnright
("I don't trust liberals, I trust conservatives." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca)
To: Red_Devil 232
He could have been good if he just asked one question at a time and got some kind of answer. ONE QUESTION AT A TIME! That would have given her the opportunity to filibuster. Questioning a snake like Hillary Clinton is all about dominating the conversation because she's not going to give you a straight answer. It's about burying her in her own incompetence.
387 posted on
01/23/2013 10:09:39 AM PST by
Colonel_Flagg
("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson