you can be an spo and not be armed
you can be an spo and not be armed>>>>>>>>>>
True. But why bother? One does not have to be an SPO to work as unarmed security in as DC private security.
To work armed in DC in private security, one has to have an SPO licence.
Thats the point I was trying to make. The attack on the NRA is bogus. Sidwell wants the option to arm its security officers, or does arm them.Their ad proves it.
“you can be an spo and not be armed”
What is so difficult for some people to understand? Many of the kids at that school are very high-value targets to bad people, and therefore are protected by armed guards wherever they go.
These parents ARE NOT going to just drop their kids off at the same place every day and leave them at the mercy of some nut off the street with a 38 Special.
The First Amendment permits the media to basically publish whatever they want - it DOES NOT require us to believe all of it - especially when it’s sheer lunacy and serves a political agenda.
...and finally, even if the school were willing to leave their kids TOTALLY UNPROTECTED (except for the times when a president has kids enrolled), would they really announce that to the world, via the Washington Post?