Is it true that at his inaug Monday, zero is considering not using the bible? Heard this on some news cast last week.
The pResident doesn’t have to destroy the republican party, the Republican party is doing a perfect job of that themselves.
He should thank Allah that Republican party politicians have no balls.
he’s been pantsing the GOP for 4 years... the throat would be the least of my concerns
Let him try. He doesn’t have the votes. And he isn’t going to gain seats in 2014. The one thing that might be good for the GOP is being passive aggressive. I don’t think it’s likely that any serious, beneficial action on the debt occurs over the next four years. So rather than try to force Obama into entitlement reform (which he and the Senate would likely only buy into with a VAT), just hold the line on taxes, refuse to increase spending, undercut Obama care, refuse to cooperate on immigration, and pray for the health of the Supreme Court.
The GOP position should be “you got your tax hike on the rich, problem solved”, then walk away and hope for better results in 2014 and 2016. Obama isn’t going to do anything serious about spending without agreement to ridiculous tax hikes, so let him own the spending and debt, and we will see if that “destroys” the GOP.
Dickerson doesn’t realize that gun control isn’t getting out of the Senate, so blaming the GOP for that isn’t going anywhere. And I’m sure the electorate will be pitching a fit over the lack of carbon taxes. He is spending too much time in DC with his buddies and too little time in flyover country.
If only we had such a party. The sooner Obama "destroys" the existing R party the better. A weaker R party won't be able to keep conservatives out or will be an opportunity for a third party to gain some seats.
I wonder if the author would be in favor of the Bill Ayers’ idea of eliminating 10% of the population who stand in the way of the progressive “ideal?”
The first black skinned president turned out to be the meanest and most divisive president in history. And the most prejudiced against various groups of people. Conservatives, the so-called “wealthy”, gun owners, etc.
During the times of slavery in the US maybe at its peak 20% of American families in the states that allowed slavery owned slaves. Because most white colored people entered the US after the civil war today at best only 5% of the population in states that allowed slavery have a direct link guilt to the past exploitation of slave labor. Of course, a hundred years of Jim Crow laws, economic oppression and indefensible discrimination followed the theoretical emancipation of the slaves, but those harsh realities raise different issues from those connected to the long-ago history of bondage. The bottom line is that very few white Americans today have any direct link to slavery.
On balance Obama is the most prejudiced people in a major political office in the history of the United States. The reality is that he came in to office at a unique time in American history when race relations were the best they have ever been. Instead of working to heal race relations in a way only a black skinned man could have he did the opposite. He has pitted not only race against race but people in different economic classes against each other and people of different social interests against each other.
Barack Obama has turned out to be the most racist and hateful president in modern history. Why?
ABSOLUTELY!
Yes, Dickerson has some “great” advice for Fearless Leader: Lash out at those recalcitrant conservative wackos who refuse to go along with Obama’s plans to “fundamentally transform” i.e. completely socialize the U.S. Whip the Obamatons into a frenzy where they threaten anyone tarred with the conservative label. Some nut threatened to bomb the Madison, Wisc. capital due to his hatred of Scott Walker. That’s a start. Get some of those Occupy dopes to defecate on conservative politicians cars instead of police cars. There’s countless wonderful ways where The Great Spreader can foment discontent among the faithful. Throw more pies at conservative speakers. Yes, the list is endless.
I don’t think there will be much of a reaction if (well, when) Obama attacks the GOP, because for one thing, the GOP has so little support that people will just take it as rhetoric. The Tea Party is yesterday’s news and isn’t really visible enough anymore to be a good target, so I think Obama will just engage in some vague murmuring about his “enemies,” since he has no hesitation in using this word.
But this will just add to the division and tension that already exists, street crime in which non-blacks are the victims (which he is treating as a political statement, true to Bill Ayers’ Weathermen background) will rise and social chaos such as rioting will be tolerated to an even greater extent, and our economy will be so bad that there simply won’t be time left over for most of us to do anything but survive. That’s how Stalin managed to eliminate his enemies: starve them.
Obama doesn’t have to declare war on the Republican Party, they already work for him now.
All he has to say is “BOO” and they run like cockroaches when the light is turned on.
No problem. The GOP is destroying itself.
Why does Obama have to declare war on the Republicans when they give him basically anything he wants. The Republicans are the ones that need to declare war but we all know that won’t happen.
I would like to see the GOP’s demise as well. That way we could have actual opposition to the dem party. For instance, in the form of the Tea Party.
Hell, even Conservatives have declared war on the Republican Party.
He’d go for the ‘nads, but the GOP doesn’t have any.
“The challenge for President Obama’s speech is the challenge of his second term: how to be great when the environment stinks...”
Yes, it is STILL all about Obama. The hell with the rest of the country.
It is not an error but an earnestly desired outcome. I suspect the Regime and its supporters are pretty certain of the various armed services and law enforcement organizations and would love an “insurrection” as an excuse to crack down on the “bitter clinger” segments of the population.
Imagine believing "all eyes" will be on the monster, hanging on every lisp whistle and pedantic phrase. The very idea gives me a piss-shiver. I may be watching Turner Classic Movies, but I will not be watching, much less thinking, about the inaugural gaiety, tomorrow.
The Left always falls short on the consequences of crushing political enemies. It also escapes their notice that MOST people will not be watching, tomorrow.