State Police Identify Weapons Used In Sandy Hook Investigation; Investigation Continues

The Newtown Bee ^ | January 18, 2013 | Newtown Bee

[Uncle Chip]

In press conferences that have been held since 12/14, the Connecticut State Police have identified all of the weapons seized from the crime scene at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

"To eliminate any confusion or misinformation, we will again describe and identify the weapons seized at the school crime scene," Connecticut State Police Spokesman Lt J. Paul Vance said Friday, January 18, via a press release.

Seized inside the school were the following: a Bushmaster .223 caliber-- model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round clips; a Glock 10 mm handgun; and a Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun.

Seized from the suspect’s car in parking lot was a Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun.

The case remains under investigation.

[762X51]

Sigh, also. Yes I completely and fully understood your point. It was indeed a poorly written headline. Sarcasm looses it’s effectiveness when it has to be explained. I was agreeing with you, and it was in fact written right there in black and white” as poorly as you please...”weapons used in investigation”. Sorry it was lost on you. But on a happy note I like your screen name. Back in 1976 when I was a 15 year old new driver my mother had a 12 cylinder XKE 2+2. It was a beautiful car...yellow with tan interior. It smelled like a sports car ought to like gasoline, leather and exhaust.

[Las Vegas Ron]

Wow, you’re a sick individual.

I called you a name?

You’re the one here calling people truthers, not me.

[Resettozero]

Please see post 138. Thank you.

[Uncle Chip]

Not your responsibility to censor FR.

No one has censored you. But when your postulations that are nothing more than clay pigeons get shot down time and again then it would be wise for you to get the message and move along. If you can't compete in the arena of ideas without whining then go sit in the stands.

then the rest of us should be told.

And by "us" you mean who??

the Sandy Hook Truthers who have been whining that there is no official report from the police then when the police do release a report they whine about the police releasing the report.

Go make another U Tube propaganda video. We need another laugh.

[Uncle Chip]

No — I addressed it to Truthers and you took offence as if I was addressing you.

[Resettozero]

Some of us FReepers don’t want this site to turn into an Alex Jones style truther den, and feel compelled to combat the rabid, irresponsible junk that keeps getting posted on this topic.

Have you or "some of us FReepers" been asked by any moderator or the operators of FR to be combative or to censor dissenting opinions or questioners of the Sandy Hook incident on any Free Republic forum?

[Resettozero]

Go make another U Tube propaganda video. We need another laugh.

Never have made a You Tube video. I am a little curious why you are so hateful towards FReepers who disagree with your sales pitch of the Sandy Hook incident. It seems inordinate to me.

[Uncle Chip]

That question of yours does not even deserve to be dignified with a response. You still don’t get it.

[Uncle Chip]

Are you referring to this official press release by the state police as a “sales pitch”???

[Resettozero]

But when your postulations that are nothing more than clay pigeons get shot down time and again then it would be wise for you to get the message and move along. If you can't compete in the arena of ideas without whining then go sit in the stands.

Do you realize that I, and hopefully many other FReepers, can recognize your responses, such as the one quoted here, as pure Alinsky manipulations?

[FLAMING DEATH]

Yep.

The "с" is pronounced like the "s" in "snake"

The "а" is pronounced "ah"

The "и" is pronounced "ee"

The "г" is pronounced "g" as in "gun"

The second "а" is also pronounced "ah".

"sah ee gah"

IOW, "Saiga".

They looked at the characters on the side of the gun and just substituted the most similar looking English letters.

See for yourself here: http://tts.imtranslator.net/Nqbl

[Resettozero]

That question of yours does not even deserve to be dignified with a response. You still don’t get it.

So then, you have not been authorized by a moderator or an operator of FR to stifle posters who dissent from your opinions regarding what may or may not have happened during the Sandy Hook incident.

[FLAMING DEATH]

[Uncle Chip]

Oh really — tell me more, oh great Karnak.

[Resettozero]

Are you referring to this official press release by the state police as a “sales pitch”???

Now that's just a plain ol' bait and switch of questions to deflect having to give a genuine response. I've noticed you and a few of the posters who agree with your rendering of the Sandy Hook incident story use this tactic often on FR Sandy Hook threads.

[Uncle Chip]

The reporter transcribing probably just threw up his hands and said: “it all looks like Greek to me” as he was Russian out the door.

[Resettozero]

Oh really — tell me more, oh great Karnak.

You and your sidekicks have been making a mockery of recent discussions on these FR Sandy Hook incident threads by placing labels (such as Sandy Hook Truthers and other names) on those who do not agree with your accounts and then by applying standard Alinsky tactics, such as this one against those who have questions about what may or may not have happened that day.

[Resettozero]

Oh really — tell me more, oh great Karnak.

While there is the possibility you do not know that you are using hateful Alinsky maneuverings in your dealings with FReepers you do not like, you ARE using those tactics nonetheless -- as well as just generally being snotty.

[Uncle Chip]

So then can I assume by that answer of yours that you accept the press release today by the state police as a matter of fact.

[Resettozero]

That question of yours does not even deserve to be dignified with a response. You still don’t get it.

You have chosen not to answer a question you CAN answer, while demanding answers to comments you machine-gun toward those who do not necessarily agree with your characterization of Sandy Hook events. No, I don't get it.

Again, the question I asked you in sincerity: Have you been requested or authorized by a moderator or an operator of FR to stifle or intimidate posters who dissent from your opinions regarding what may or may not have happened during the Sandy Hook incident?