There is tons of interesting things we can get from military surplus websites including an old british destroyer.
About the nuclear weapons and chemical weapons, much of the government owns patents on, therefore I highly doubt we would be able to simply buy develop on our own. However, owning a howitzers, tanks, attack helos, air bombers with the bombs should not really be banned. It does get to a point to where of economics about what is most effective for a citizen to maintain. As far as being able to train on these, that is another dilema in itself. You would have to have a 200,000 acre ranch in Wyoming or something.
One thing people need to remind themselves though, what was the British army marching to Concord for? So when they ask stupid questions like “What do you need these guns for?”. They should think about this.
>>One thing people need to remind themselves though, what was the British army marching to Concord for?
I find that Liberals shilling for gun civil rights infringements have no idea whatsoever.
Patents expire after 20 years.
There are no nuclear weapons patents. A patent requires disclosing the technology.
OTOH, there is no patent on the Coca-Cola recipe either...