Posted on 01/17/2013 6:38:37 AM PST by AngryCapitalist
Pete Williams reports that no AR USED AT SANDY HOOK! Only 4 handguns found, Lanza left his rifle in the car. This is why Sandy HOOK was never mentioned at yesterday's signing by Barry.
http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50208495#50208495
(Excerpt) Read more at video.today.msnbc.msn.com ...
Of course you will, because it makes your little story more dramatic. I’ll go with the eyewitness account of a guy who knows what he is talking about.
And yet you are going with that same media rather than the police who corrected that media time and again.
>>Really. The same source also said that Mrs Lanza was the kindergarten teacher there. Should we go with that too???<<
Yeah really. Identifying what Lanza was wearing THAT DAY is a lot different than talking about Mrs. Lanza.
Hi ILS21R!
How are FReepers treatin’ you today? Need some Tylenol?
They will. People want hard facts right away and that's just not going to happen. These investigations take time. Eventually all the weapons used at Columbine were photographed and released. It took several weeks.
The conspiracy nuts want to believe that the supposed "facts" released in the minutes and hours following Sandy Hook were truthful and everything released since then has been part of a cover up. If you recall Columbine, the killers were trenchcoat-wearing members of the "Trenchcoat Mafia", unpopular misfits who targeted the jocks and popular kids who tormented them. This is still the meme today and none of it turned out to be true.
Give it some time and the facts will be released. There's still an active investigation going on with lots of people to interview, re-interview, stories to assemble and timelines to put together.
It’s hard to tell — could it be additional magazine clips??? It doesn’t look like another gun.
You've been here since 2005 and you've never seen someone post "Bump For Later"?
What do you see at 2:33???
I know. It's a conundrum. Still, if there's unedited video available it's better evidence than the say so of talking heads, cops, reporters, or you for instance.
Actually, they originally said Lanza’s brother was the shooter, and there was an additional crime scene in New Jersey, Does anyone remember the aftermath of Columbine? There was wall to wall coverage, photos of the killers, victims, parents, continual videos of the kids escaping the school. interviews with teachers, friends, family, EM vehicles transporting. The list goes on, but with Sandy Hook, it’s like it happened in a third world country. I believe it happened but I believe there were multiple shooters. I also think the bama admin has shut info down so they can create their own weapons and scenario to coincide with the gun grab.
I see one white clad guy reach in and pull one long black object out of the trunk and a second white clad guy reach in and pull a second long black object out of the trunk and then the 4 white clad guys walk away.
What do you see?
I don’t know what to believe but I do believe those interviewed as family members, at least some of them, were actors.
How does this video match the other one that has been out for weeks??
If they were going to pull a fast one here, why would they do it under the flood lights??? Why not turn the lights off and then do it.
“1. We don’t know that Vance was there.”
Yes we do.
“As Connecticut State Police continue to search for answers into last week’s deadly mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Lt. Paul Vance spoke out about what he witnessed last Friday.”
http://www.wfsb.com/story/20380533/lt-vance-speaks-about-his-experiences-at-sandy-hook
“2. Vance is a state police “spokesman”.”
He’s a firsthand witness, as demonstrated above. He may be a spokesman as well, but that doesn’t diminish his credibility as a firsthand witness.
“If they say Lanza was wearing a bulletproof vest early on, then he was wearing a bulletproof vest.”
No, if Lanza was wearing a bulletproof vest, then he was, and if he wasn’t, then he wasn’t. It doesn’t matter what the media says, they cannot change the facts of the case depending on how they report it. That is simply magical thinking.
Why push a .223 Bushmaster narrative over semi-auto handguns? Gun grabbers have long dreamt of a handgun ban, even if they don't publicly admit such as of late.
I see the one long weapon but that’s it. The something the other is carrying is not a long gun but grey and shorter perhaps a magazine clip.
I do know this actually, but I still made the mistake for whatever reason lol
The older video I have seen is shorter in duration, is zoomed in, and does not show what the other evidence gatherers are doing to the left of the guy handling the shotgun.
You keep asking me questions, but won't answer any of mine. I think I'm done with you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.