It is too much to ask because I believe in looking at evidence and seeing where it leads.
I can’t even begin to count how many posters on this site REFUSED to understand English Law as it pertains to Obama’s British Citizenship.
The law right in front of them and they continued on. I was the first to bring that fight to FR because I do believe you should look at the info that is available and not just the info that fits your agenda.
So for example, the people who claim that Sandy Hook was a hoax point to time stamps. Instead of going “LA LA LA NUTTER NUTTER NUTTER” people should be figuring out why info had those time stamps. It is also a way of debunking the argument.
Same with the photo. She has no apparent legs. Is it photoshopped. People who are good at that thing should see if it is and see when it was released. It may be a disinformation tool or it might not be
But you can’t know unless you look hard at evidence instead of running around saying NUTTER NUTTER NUTTER
But you're not looking at the evidence. You're running away from it.
If I had to believe the things you do to keep my guns then I would tell them here take my guns. It's better to keep my mind and lose my guns than vice versa.
“It is too much to ask because I believe in looking at evidence and seeing where it leads.”
The problem is, we don’t have hardly any evidence to look at yet, because nobody will wait until the investigation releases the evidence. If you want to pore over the investigative reports and appendices line by line to see if we can poke holes in it, I’ll be right there with you. Until we have something to go on, however, you are just shooting in the dark.
“So for example, the people who claim that Sandy Hook was a hoax point to time stamps. Instead of going “LA LA LA NUTTER NUTTER NUTTER” people should be figuring out why info had those time stamps. It is also a way of debunking the argument.”
Yes, and some people have done just that, and the conspiracy nuts continue citing the google search as evidence regardless. I even demonstrated to a few people today that I could recreate the “anomaly” for any randomly chosen time or event, but nobody cares because they would rather go on repeating untruths that further their conspiracy theory.
“Same with the photo. She has no apparent legs. Is it photoshopped.”
I really don’t care. The girl appears to be sitting with her legs to the side, and my guess is that she is wearing black leggings that blend in with her mother’s black pants. I actually do have the know-how to examine it to see if it was photoshopped, but I can’t be bothered, because the idea is so ludicrous.