“When it became questions about whether the school had any kids in it at all, or whether the parents were actually actors, or whether John Goodman was hired to play a police officer, that’s when it became clear the lunatics had taken over the asylum.”
Let’s assume that the event took place. It’s the most likely assumption with the highest degree of probability.
Let’s also assume that there had to be over 400 kids and personnel in that facility at the time of the shooting. Some end up dead and injured. That still leaves over 400 walking bodies.
I don’t care how well trained those young kids are - there are many that are not going to remain calm. Even adults freak out when they are being shot at.
It would be chaos. After you get the kids out they are going to be traumatized. They will need medical attention. They need their parents. Many will still probably be wondering if they are even safe from the shooting.
There should be been a lot of ambulances. A lot of children.
A lot of freaked out parents. A lot of media. A lot of photographs. A lot of video footage. A lot of evidence of pandemonium.
I am not seeing a scene that corresponds with these details.
Why is that? It is a reasonable question.
Is it being sanitized???
If you have the pictures or the footage that corresponds with what that scene should have looked like I would like to see it.
If I was a member of the liberal agenda driven MSM, I most certainly would not publish the pictures and videos that the SH truthers are demanding.
Denying them answers to their questions feeds their frenzy and makes them look even dumber and crazier.
Which serves MSM agenda.
Jump off this bandwagon, it’s being driven by the MSM.
OK. So your post is a bunch of stuff that you think you SHOULD see, but you don’t see.
That doesn’t show it didn’t happen, because you weren’t there. You are working off of news feed stories.
So you think you should see lots of pictures. But you don’t KNOW that pictures were taken.
But that’s where your story ends. It’s like there is a puddle on the floor. And you think, hey a puddle, there should be a glass on it’s side, or drips from the ceiling. But there aren’t.
But does that mean there isn’t a puddle on the floor, or just that you didn’t think of another explanation for the puddle on the floor?
So, do you think there weren’t 400 kids? That’s the argument you are making — “if there were 400 kids, we’d see A, we don’t see A, .... but you don’t reach the conclusion. You just let it hanging there.
Because the conclusion contradicts the facts that are known. You are trying to use secondary, indirect measurements when you have primary facts. With primary facts, you can ignore the lack of indirect secondary measurements. It doesn’t matter — a LACK of some expected thing doesn’t negate a known fact, it just means you understand how things happened.
Who cares that you don’t see kids in the chopper shot? There are very few chopper shots. The chopper doesn’t seem to have been there long.
We know the kids were moved. We see them being moved. I showed you pictures of two sets of kids being moved. And you can see they aren’t panicking. On the other hand, 4 kids panicked and ran away, and ended up at some guy’s house.
So instead of asking “why can’t we see the kids”, why not recognize the reality that the kids were moved, and ask “what is it about the chopper that kept it from taking pictures of the kids”.
Like it wasn’t there when the kids moved, or at that moment it was spending several minutes watching the guy in the woods.
BTW, if someone walks up to you and slaps you, you don’t have to “assume the event took place” — you know it. We know this event took place, because eyewitnesses who are trained have reported about the event.
Of course, you can choose not to believe them. They could be lying. But if you assume that everybody would lie to you, then I guess you never believe anything unless you see it with your own eyes.
I’m not faulting you for that. I never “fully believe” things I don’t see myself. I accept them , if they are rational, but always leave open the possibility that I’ve been lied to. But if you don’t accept that you have to just take a lot of things on faith, meaning that you have to hold a certain degree of trust in those people who we have entrusted to law enforcement and other critical functions.