All of it is nonsense. As I illustrated with the Daily Kos example (you aren’t going to start defending them, are you?!) is that there’s always a bunch of technical mumbo-jumbo which sounds really, really convincing to people who don’t know better.
Here are my credentials: I’m God’s Personal Appointed Image Verifier. Prove otherwise.
Anyway, it doesn’t matter, there is overwhelming evidence that Obama was born in Honolulu. Case closed.
Alvin Onaka is the State of Hawaii’s legally-appointed image verifier. He is legally required to verify everything he can, and not verify anything he can’t.
He was asked to verify that the White House image is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”. He wouldn’t verify it.
He was asked to verify that the information contained in the White House image is identical to the information contained in the original record on file. He wouldn’t.
He was asked to verify male, Aug 4, 1961, Honolulu, Oahu, Stanley Ann Dunham, and Barack Hussein Obama. The only one he even MENTIONED was Honolulu (but not Oahu), and what he said was that the BC they have “indicates” (claims) Honolulu.
Every legally-foundational document that exists for Obama has already either been proven as a forgery, or is known to have been breached to allow for forgery.
So where is this “overwhelming evidence”?
What, specifically, is nonsense?
Are you being paid to be a troll here?