Here’s what a google search turned up:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/documents/2012/05/hawaiis-verification-of-president-obamas-birth.php?page=1
It does no good to look at the “answer” unless you also look at the “question”. To get the 2nd page of Bennett’s request, TPM Muckraker had to have also received the 1st page - the actual application form which Bennett twice mentions in page 2 of his request. Why do you suppose TPM Muckraker CENSORED that actual application?
The fact of the matter is that the CRITICAL question - whether it can be verified that Barack Hussein Obama, II, male, was born in Honolulu on the island of Oahu to mother Stanley Ann Dunham and father Barack Hussein Obama - got a resounding “no” for an answer.
The silence in that verification is deafening - but only if you know that was the question that Bennett clearly asked and that Onaka was required to verify (say that he specifically verifies) every submitted “fact” that he legally CAN verify. If he can verify Honolulu he also legally has to verify Oahu. He didn’t, so it is clear that he is not verifying Honolulu as the place the birth really happened, but only as the CLAIM on the non-valid BC (what the BC “indicates”, which has no legal meaning whatsoever).
He verified that the claims that are on the White House BC are also on the HDOH record. Why, then, did he not verify ANY of those claims as being the way the event actually happened? Why no mention of male, Aug 4, 1961, Oahu, Stanley Ann Dunham, and Barack Hussein Obama, and only mention of the BC “indicating” Honolulu (which is as true for a non-valid BC as for a valid one)?
When asked why no DOB was verified, Bennett responded that it was a clerical error; somebody “just forgot”. He’s accusing Onaka of an unlawful response, after Bennett wrangled for months with the HI AG’s office over every jot and tiddle of the legalities. That’s a serious matter; what evidence supports that? Legally, the presumption has to be of REGULARITY - that the response was done in compliance with the law, unless there is evidence to suggest otherwise.
And if Bennett or anybody else comes up with evidence that the verification was not lawful, then it is worthless and we’re back to square one - that even after proper and lawful procedures were done to verify Obama’s birth facts, we still have nothing. That’s the BEST-CASE scenario for Obama - a net score of zero after the legal authorities in Hawaii had responded to a lawful request for verification.
Don’t expect TPM to have the integrity to address this issue with serious legal reasoning; their job all along has been to provide a fig leaf, and because Americans are stupid, the truth has no big megaphone, and the legal system has been taken hostage, the lies have carried the day. For now.
When the Day of Justice arrives we will see who has been in the truth and who are children of the Father of Lies. He steals, kills, and destroys, and he and all his children will be exposed for who they are and what they have done. Count on it.