Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevkrom

Where I am, I won’t see LTE until the end of the decade, if at all.


79 posted on 01/14/2013 9:48:09 AM PST by wolfpat (Not to know what has been transacted in former times is to be always a child. -- Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: wolfpat

Perhaps not, but a large portion of the smartphone market is in major urban areas, and the lack of LTE was a major knock on the 4S (though admittedly, even major metro LTE coverage was pretty spotty until shortly before the 5 came out). So for a significant portion of the market, the 5 certainly has a major selling point over the 4S with LTE.

As for myself, I have had my 4S for a year and have no plans on upgrading before my current contract runs out. If I had a 3 or 3GS, or maybe even a 4, out of contract, then I’d probably have gotten the 5. As things look right now, I’ll probably ditch AT&T for a no-subsidy T-Moble plan early next year. I very well may look into getting an LTE-compatible phone then, though I may not want to shell out for the “latest and greatest” model. (That is, if we assume a new model, such as a 5X [for lack of a better name]), by then, I might very well just get the 5 if I can find it cheap enough.)


80 posted on 01/14/2013 10:00:37 AM PST by kevkrom (If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson