[Mozilla]

The audio host is at the site link.

The link to the article and the audio of interview

[martin_fierro]

It's two-card Monte, as we well know.

[mnehring]

I would rather have an individualist party that promotes freedom and capitalism.

[smoothsailing]

Just what we need, another third party. We have so few.

[John Leland 1789]

It is a good interview.

Better, though, to have a "nationalist" ('borders,' 'language,' 'culture') wing rise up within the Republican Party (if that is not what the Tea Party actually is), to challenge and oust the elites.

I have never seen a list of names, compiled for public use, of those considered the "Republican Establishment."

We guess at a half dozen of them, but has any one ever compiled an actual list of the people who control the Republican Party at the top, behind the scenes ?

[Longbow1969]

I propose a 7th party to challenge the GOP. We’ll call it the Pseudo Nationalist Popular Peoples Independence Party. This party will be everything the Republicans aren’t. Mad the GOP doesn’t stand strong on debt? This party is for you. Upset the GOP doesn’t direct enough resources into the “good” government programs that you care about? Then the PNPPIP is for you. Pissed that the Republicans only pay lip service to social issues? Look no further than the Pseudo Nationalist Popular Peoples Independence Party! Young and irritated that the GOP is out of touch because of it’s old uncool positions on gay marriage, abortion, etc? Yup, the PNPPIP is hip and happening and has just the platform that will appeal to the new generations. This party will be so pure it will appeal to conservatives of every stripe!

[Alter Kaker]

Yeah because nationalist parties worked so well in the past. When can we occupy the Sudetenland?

[Alter Kaker]

Yeah because nationalist parties worked so well in the past. When can we occupy the Sudetenland?

[pallis]

Democrats will love it, and help in any way they can. I favor a single party. It could screw up 60 years of Socialism in one swift move.

[grumpygresh]

I recommend merger between the Nationalist and Socialist parties. National-Socialist party, kind of has a nice ring to it. ;)
It might even bring in the low information voters.

[SoldierDad]

A Nationalist party such as what Hitler brought into being?? Hmmmm Michael???? Go back to your boat and drink your wine.

[COBOL2Java]

"There is no Republican Party," Savage told talk show host Aaron Klein. "It's an appendage of the Democrat machine, as we've all just seen. It's two-card Monte, as we well know. It's a game being played against the American people. You've got the drunk Boehner on the one side, and the quasi-pseudo-crypto Marxist on the other, who is really just enjoying the ride in Hawaii right now, representing his factions."

All you Republican apologists can make fun of Savage, but every word in that paragraph is 100% true. Sad, but true.

[JerseyanExile]

Yeah, if you want to start a conservative third party, calling it the “Nationalist Party” is a pretty bad way to start things off.

[Arlis]

If there is a 3rd party move, it should be the Constitution
Party.....which already exists.....

Nationalist is never a good foundation for anything.......e.g., Nationalist Socialist Party.....as in “Nazi”....

The key is in recovering/restoring the foundation....

[elpadre]

two right of center political parties will guarantee a socialist/communist government forever. - best to restructure the GOP from the right to left.

[elpadre]

two right of center political parties will guarantee a socialist/communist government forever. - best to restructure the GOP from the right to left.

[elpadre]

two right of center political parties will guarantee a socialist/communist government forever. - best to restructure the GOP from the right to left.