Liberal, like gay and comrade, was once a perfectly honorable word. What they actually are is leftist. The Founders were liberal, in the true meaning of the word, not the corrupted modern usage.
If we cannot control the language, we will certainly lose the debate.
“Liberal fascists”. Is there any other kind now?
In an objective view of the Fascist movement of Italy and Spain, and the Nationalist Socialist German Working-men’s Party of Germany, the US liberals, both Democrat and Republican, are following closely in their footsteps. Even the Stalinist Soviet Union and Maoist Chinese Peoples Republic much more nearly resemble the current liberal establishment in this country, than any of the American ideals of God, home and country, with freedom and liberty for all.
In fact, in the early part of the 1930’s, FDR and his New Deal were patterned in great part upon the blueprint being used by both Germany and Italy to shore up the shaky economies of their countries as well. The Germans and Italians managed to make it work for a while by aggressive actions against their own internal dissidents and those in neighboring nations.
But so far, the liberals in the US have not been able to establish “re-education camps” in this country. On the other hand, they do seem to have gained sufficient marginal control of the election process to subvert it to win elections.
It matters not how the people vote, it matters who counts the votes. And there appears, from anecdotal reports, to have been some MASSIVE vote fraud perpetuated in key states that, somehow, at the last minute, tallied up by sufficent margins to win in practically ALL the “battleground” states.
Your point on the language thing is a real one.
That’s why I appreciated Alex Jones’ style and substance against Piers T. Morgan, (” T “ for tyrant) on LIVE CNN, before a fascist audience.
First time in decades anyone, anywhere, pushed back in the right tone for the occassion, and used exactly the right language.
With Jones’ nerve and testosterone in his use of language, we conservatives who are not crazy could be taken seriously. Alas, the silence and PC approach has us where we are today.
If we cannot control the language, we will certainly lose the debate.
&&&
So true.
Agreed.
He who defines, wins.