Megyn Kelly Challenges Professor Who Wants America to ‘Give Up’ U.S. Constitution

The Blaze ^ | 12/7/2013 | Billy Hallowell

[Carbonsteel]

Now that Obama has been re-elected, hopefully the left will be emboldened enough to start being honest about what they believe.....like this clown here.

I promise most of those on the left think like this and don't have any use for our constitution, except when it's convenient for them to do so.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

You give up the Communist Manifesto instead, perfesser.

[SnakeDoctor]

Probably would’ve been better off not giving him airtime than challenging him.

SnakeDoc

[popdonnelly]

If we abandon the Constitution, professor, what will authorize our government and our laws? Some law professor. He’s just looking for attention.

[onyx]

See? You were spot on!
:)

[popdonnelly]

Here’s a thought. Let the left-leaning States abandon the Constitution, while the rest of the States keep it. Then we can divide into two countries. Everybody would be happy.

[Williams]

We need to stop complaining and start fighting back against these people. Conservatives who didn’t have time to be activists like leftists, are losing everything.

[Amendment10]

Regarding the idea of abandoning the Constitution, the horse escaped from the barn quite awhile ago. But voters don’t understand this because they don’t know the Constitution anyway, particularly the Founding State’s division of federal and state government powers.

[MrsEmmaPeel]

We already have abandoned the Constitution. Kelo vs New London Even worse when you consider that 7/9 justices at the time of that decision were appointed by Republicans.

[Bitsy]

Conservatives who didn’t have time to be activists like leftists, are losing everything.

That’s the trouble. conservatives have real jobs and are accountable for their time. Leftist communists are professors who have one class a day or no job so they have plenty of time to protest and rally all supported by the communist mainstream media and hollywood. We have no one except ourselves to put up the fight.

[bunkerhill7]

BRING `EM BACK

“Many Committees of Safety were established throughout Colonial America at the start of the American Revolution. These committees in part grew out of the less formal Sons of Liberty groups, which started to appear in the 1760s as means to discuss and spread awareness of the concerns of the time, and often consisted of every male adult in the community. The local militias were usually under the control of the committees, which in turn sent representatives to county- and colony-level assemblies to represent their local interests.

Committees of Safety formed in 1774 to keep watch on the DISTRUSTED royal government. By 1775 they had become the operating government of all the colonies, as the royal officials were expelled. Massachusetts took the lead in the appointment of a committee of safety so early as the autumn of 1774, of which John Hancock was chairman. It was given power to call out mandatory militia, with penalties for failing to respond to a call-up, and provide means of defense. It provided many of the duties of a provisional government. Other colonies appointed committees of safety. One was appointed in the city of New York, composed of the leading citizens. In the spring of 1778, the New York state legislature abolished all committees in New York in favor of “COMMISSIONERS OF CONSPIRACY”.

In North Carolina, the demand for independence came from local grassroots Committees of Safety. The First Continental Congress had urged their creation in 1774. By 1775 they had become counter-governments that gradually replaced royal authority and took control of local governments. They regulated the economy, politics, morality, and militia of their individual communities. After December 1776 they came under the control of a more powerful central authority, the Council of Safety.[1]

These Committees of Safety were in constant communication with committees of correspondence, which disseminated information among the militia units and provided a clearinghouse of information and intelligence on enemy activities.”
-WIKI

[C210N]

So, pray tell me, how would things be any different today if we had abandoned the Constitution 80 years ago?

Would we no longer have a limited federal government, for example?

[funfan]

Megyn Kelly is this the same Megyn Kelly who was filled with so much joy and excitement on Election night that Obama had won? I have not turned on Fox since that evening and I don't believe one word coming from her mouth in other words she probably agrees with the Professor
but you won't know it until the day she squeals with joy as the Constitution is done away with.
She is one of them.

[ArrogantBustard]

Here’s a thought. Let the left-leaning States abandon the Constitution, while the rest of the States keep it. Then we can divide into two countries. Everybody would be happy.

No such luck ... within 10 years, the Union of American Socialist Peoples' Republics would be fomenting guerrilla insurrection in, and trying to invade, the (truncated) United States of America.

You cannot make peace with tyrants.

[Gator113]

..

[tpmintx]

If we abandon the Constitution, professor, what will authorize our government and our laws?

We will have the kind benevolence of our Lord and Savior, King Barry the First. Barry will go down in history as the law-giver and all deference will be made to his image. Praise be to Allah and to Mohamed, His prophet, and to his almighty son Barry I.

In case it's not obvious - </sarc>

[tpmintx]

So, pray tell me, how would things be any different today if we had abandoned the Constitution 80 years ago?

I can certainly tell you that things would be very different if we had not abandoned the constitution in 1861.

[donna]

This is how they made homosexuality acceptable.

First, you talk about how shocked you are . . .

[SparkyBass]