I been making similar points, the opposition to the better plan B was all based on a lie : That taxes would not of went up if the House blocked anything from passing.
So the argument was dishonest from the start.
So now they are complaining that this passed Senate bill didnt have enough budget cuts, so Bohner was supposed to block tax cut extensions and ensure all the Bush rates went up because it was missing spending cuts?
Is this the argument?
I have seen your posts and yes, you have made rational comments. Most criticizers of the FC bill make blanket statements with NOTHING CONCRETE item by item refutation of the bill. So it is just hot air, and nothing substantive or realistic.