That's what I've been trying to tell YOU.
As a first step.
The second is that, throwing out all the bums means "throw out all DEMS, and *replace* RINO, GOP-e types with conservatives."
Want me to throw in the Obaama kneepad accessories for your Boehner Bobblehead doll, there?
Cheers!
According to the brilliant Bianna Golodryga just now on ABC News, the cliff mess could screw up the rip roaring Obama economic recovery that’s ongoing.
Well, you're definitely a foul mouthed type of person. Not what I expect to see on a family oriented site.
That's what I've been trying to tell YOU.
LOL, you're such a dolt man. I mean, I guess every forum has some dunderheads like yourself, but it's difficult to believe you can really be this slow.
This was the comment I originally responded to from tenmountainman:
Throw all the bums out election on both sides.
Here was my response to tenmountainman:
Really? Are we back to this silly populist sounding nonsense? This "throw all the bums out" stuff has never worked. It's a meaningless statement. If you throw a Republican out, you're going to get a Democrat who is more liberal. Period. There are no candidates from any other party's that are going to win these seats. It's either Republican or Democrat. If you throw a Republican out, you get a Democrat. If you throw a Democrat out you get a Republican. If you have a "throw all the bums out election" the House would switch to Democrat control and the Senate to Republicans which would result in no meaningful change.
To which you barge in and said to me:
Forgot 2010, troll-boy?
My original point stands. 2010 was NOT a throw all the bums from both sides out election. Why you elbowed your way into the conversation with a bunch of insults and stupid commentary I don't know. You're wrong as usual, and you've accomplished nothing more than to make a jerk out of yourself.