[Mrs. Don-o]

They see this as immoral, too: because that's pushing off the dire consequences onto the shoulders of their employees. They (Hobby Lobby) would then skip out by paying #2,000 per year as a "fine" to the HHS per employee, AND each employee would be required to individually purchase insurance which contains/subsidizes the morally objectionable coverage.

So "Hobby Lobby" would wash their hands "clean" with a $2,000/year fine per employee, and EACH EMPLOYEE would be stuck with the burden of having to resist individually.

Hobby Lobby says they consider it immoral and cowardly to get the company off "cheap" while forcing the entire burden onto their employees.

[Spktyr]

Oh, sorry, didn’t finish. Don’t offer insurance, but allow an insurance company to advertise in employee spaces and automatically raise the salaries of all employees ‘coincidentally’ by the same amount as the ‘special deal’ that insurer would be offering their workers.