Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs
Schwarzkopf was a good man, a good soldier, but I'm sorry, the war was not a good one imho (an of course in hindsight) -- nothing to do with the General, but more the politics

Saddam was an evil dictator, but he was a secular evil dictator who kept the Iranis and the Sunni Al Qaeda militants in their place

Us putting troops in Saudi arabia was the justification used for 9/11

If we had let Saddam keep Kuwait, he would have threatened the Saudis and prevented the Saudis giving money to train Wahabbis all over the world (he would have grabbed the money for himself) and Saddam would have gone back to his real aim -- to kick the living s*** out of the Iranis

With the oil money, he could have done this, slaughtering thousands of Irani Shia fanatics (like he did in the Iran-Iraq war)

It also meant that we started paying money and attention to the Pakis again (due to Afghanistan) instead of them just breaking up.

In hindsight, we should have stayed the heck out of that -- GWI leads directly to 9/11, GWII and the Afghanistan involvement.

18 posted on 12/28/2012 3:35:39 AM PST by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

I agree. In hindsight, we should have just cut a quiet deal with Saddam and bought our oil from him rather than the corrupt Kuwaitis or the Wahhabi Saudis. Kuwait was just not worth the trouble it ultimately wrought, and neither was Saudi Arabia. And he could have used all of that oil money to continue pummeling the Iranians.


22 posted on 12/28/2012 5:03:40 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson