Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Scourge of Concealed Weapons
NY Times ^ | 12/23/2012 | Op Ed

Posted on 12/23/2012 1:52:50 PM PST by GreaterSwiss

Nowadays, however, there are four states that require no permit at all to carry a gun, and 35 states have permissive “shall issue” or “right-to-carry” laws that effectively take the decision of who should carry a weapon out of law enforcement’s hands. These laws say that if an applicant meets minimal criteria — one is not having been convicted of a felony, and another is not having a severe mental illness — officials have no choice about whether to issue a permit.

Some states go even further by expressly allowing guns where they should not be. Nine states now have “carry laws” that permit guns on campuses; eight permit them in bars; five permit them in places of worship. In Utah, holders of permits can now carry concealed guns in elementary schools.

Among the arguments advanced for these irresponsible statutes is the claim that “shall issue” laws have played a major role in reducing violent crime. But the National Research Council has thoroughly discredited this argument for analytical errors. In fact, the legal scholar John Donohue III and others have found that from 1977 to 2006, “shall issue” laws increased aggravated assaults by “roughly 3 to 5 percent each year.”

The federal government could help protect the public from lax state gun laws. For starters, the Fix Gun Checks Act, proposed last year in Congress, would close gaping loopholes in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System and make a huge difference in identifying many people who should be denied permits under “shall issue” laws yet slip through the state systems.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; concealed; guncontrol; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: GreaterSwiss

Using the First Amendment to argue for cancelling the Second...

...even though the Second guarantees the First.

Hmmmmm....


61 posted on 12/23/2012 3:33:03 PM PST by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss
The NYT has a obsessive fear of firearms.


62 posted on 12/23/2012 3:45:20 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (REOPEN THE CLOSED MENTAL INSTITUTIONS! Damn the ACLU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss
The Scourge of Concealed Weapons

I choose not to be a victim. I carry concealed. I have homeowners, auto, RV, boat,vehicle, health and personal liability insurance, I have fire extinguishers, smoke and CO alarms. I have alternate fuel and electricity sources. I don't gamble.

63 posted on 12/23/2012 3:48:51 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (Carry a Gun, It's a Lighter Burden Than Regret)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss

Its the NYT, of course its a lie.


64 posted on 12/23/2012 3:58:10 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss
take the decision of who should carry a weapon out of law enforcement’s hands

Since when do public employees get to determine the rights of their employers, the citizens?

65 posted on 12/23/2012 4:02:11 PM PST by JoeFromSidney ( New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. Buy from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

“Liberals have a primal fear of handguns.”

Liberals have a primal dislike of free men, whom they cannot control.


66 posted on 12/23/2012 4:16:48 PM PST by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
Violence will get you shot. It would be better simply not to cooperate, but be passive.

The classic liberal response to a rape victim... "Better not resist, just lay back and try to enjoy it. And hope he doesn't maim or kill you."

Mark

67 posted on 12/23/2012 4:23:14 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Just a thought here... How do the "aggravated assault rates" in the US compare to the rest of the world, say Great Britain, Japan, or Mexico. Even better, given the incredibly strict gun control in Mexico, how does their murder rate compare to ours? No fail leaving out the weapons supplied to the drug cartels by our own federal government...

Mark

68 posted on 12/23/2012 4:34:17 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

“Figure out where you might hide your guns.”

When it gets to the point you have to hide your guns, it has got to the point it is time to use them for the purpose envisioned in the Second Amendment.


69 posted on 12/23/2012 4:39:18 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
The NYT has a obsessive fear of firearms.

Only in the hands of potential victims... The NYT is certainly a big fan of genocide, just look at their defense of Walter Duranty's reporting to this very day.

I have no doubt that the NYT was a HUGE supporter of the Sullivan Act, which guaranteed that guns would stay out of the hands of immigrants (Irish, German, Jewish, etc) and Blacks.

Mark

70 posted on 12/23/2012 4:39:46 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

“They are looking to start a war.”

They are indeed. Idiots. Madmen.


71 posted on 12/23/2012 4:40:57 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss

Hell, if one follows the logic (illogic) of the NY Times, one would have to conclude there were no murders prior to the invention of guns. That would surprise Julius Caesar, just to name one.


72 posted on 12/23/2012 4:45:50 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

“If a war starts,it won’t stop until one side or the other is utterly destroyed.There will be no peace terms this time.”

I expect you are right.


73 posted on 12/23/2012 4:47:33 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss
But the National Research Council has thoroughly discredited this argument for analytical errors. In fact, the legal scholar John Donohue III and others have found that from 1977 to 2006, “shall issue” laws increased aggravated assaults by “roughly 3 to 5 percent each year.”

Hmm.. Using basic calculator, and an average of 4%, I seem to get a 300% increase in crime comparing '77 to '06. Don't quite think that's right...
74 posted on 12/23/2012 4:48:43 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss
the scourge of the media covering for the politicians and legal drug pushers and up to 100,000 deaths per year from medical ‘mistakes’ -

No political hay to make there -

Medical errors per year:
excerpt:

“Each year the death toll in relation to medical errors is staggering. Besides medical errors, there are 99,000 people that die each year from hospital acquired infections. This is just above the overall death rate for medical errors with 98,000 people dying each year from medical mistakes”

http://voices.yahoo.com/medical-mistakes-4889122.html?cat=5

75 posted on 12/23/2012 4:53:12 PM PST by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I am 59 Years Old and I never imagined I might die in a hail of gunfire, especially coming from some Jack Booted Thugs sent to my House by a TYRANNICAL American Government.

Nowadays, I don’t think it’s beyond the realm of possibility...


76 posted on 12/23/2012 4:53:42 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (They Live, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss; All
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XjSSUC8IlY

World's Largest Army”

spread this far and wide - now this only accounts for licensed hunters - there's undoubtedly more than twice that number who have guns for sport and/or security.

They aren't going down easy - why do you think the gov’t has, systematically over the past dozen years, ‘gifted’ local sheriff/police departments with SWAT vehicles, even tank - and we now see them practicing S.W.A.T. raid across America, for the slightest of excuses - one was for overdue college loans! and MANY, one just the other night in my little neighborhood, are conducted on “oops. wrong address.”

I suspicion instead, the increased terror raids are more to provide training and to justify the budget - and keep it coming - for the maintenance of the bloated equipment and personnel.

77 posted on 12/23/2012 5:03:14 PM PST by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duffee

“There is NO reason for Mississippi to not issue me a license so they “shall issue” me a license without me having to kiss anyones butt.”

There is no reason for a person to need a license to go armed. It is a constitutional “right” to keep and bear. If one uses a weapon against another, you will be judged on whether the shooting was justified regardless of license. Applying for a license is nothing more than backdoor central registration


78 posted on 12/23/2012 5:50:27 PM PST by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss

In an unpublished report, engineering statistician William Sturdevant found that concealed carry licensees had arrest rates far lower than the general population for every category of crime. For instance:

Licensees were 5.7 times less likely to be arrested for violent offenses than the general public - 127 per 100,000 population versus 730 per 100,000.

Licensees were 14 times less likely to be arrested for nonviolent offenses than the general public - 386 per 100,000 population versus 5,212 per 100,000.

Further, the general public is 1.4 times more likely to be arrested for murder than licensees [ see Figure I ], and no licensee had been arrested for negligent manslaughter.

from:
http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba324


79 posted on 12/23/2012 5:54:13 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

Scourge?

I would much rather spend an hour in a room full of concealed carry permitees than a room full of NYT reporters or their editors.


80 posted on 12/23/2012 5:57:42 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson