Any new info on the man wearing camo pants who was brought out of the woods?
Police Walked A Man In Camo Pants And Dark Jacket Out Of Woods: Newtown Conn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovspEgeMXb4
The solution is for elementary school teachers to carry guns.
OK, sweet cheeks, come beat me to death.
Michelle Ping!
Liberalism is so hate filled it boggles the mind.
It has a classic “My way or the highway” attitude. In other words,it does not live up to the traditional definition of “liberal”.
This U.R.I. professor sounds truly insane.
.
Bookmarking.
Y’ know? Something else has gone terribly, terribly wrong in this country when a primary figure in one of the political parties can call for the assassination of another person- ANY person & it is answered by crickets. Can you imagine what would happen if a member of any other political group did that?
As usual, the left is projecting it’s depravity onto anyone who dissents from their radical agenda.
It also strikes me that people like Michelle Malkin, Victor David Hansen, & others are probably people we should be recruiting for Congress. (How I would love to have Mark Levin, but it would be terrible for his health)
I realize that they are doing what they want to be doing, but they are head & shoulders about the “representation” we have had for far too long.
.. I just can't avoid thinking about this from for Love & Liberty by Robin Young and it's about 1857 America.
If you could first know where you are and whither you are tending, you could better judge what to do and how to do it. You initiated a policy to tolerate the Marxist-Alinsky radicals and let them rant; not only has it not ceased but was constantly augmented by decades of infiltration and indoctrination. You now have two Americas. In my opinion, it will not cease until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half statist and half free; I do not expect the house to fall; but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other.
The question today is either the opponents of statism will arrest the further spread of it and place it on course of ultimate extinction, or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become permanent.
Have you no tendency to the latter condition?
Let anyone who doubts carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination — piece of machinery, so to speak — compounded of the Republican Party hands-across-the-aisle doctrine and the dreadful actions among statism's chief architects.
I thought the liberal DemocRATS were happy on November 6th but I’ve NEVER seen them as happy as they’ve been since last Friday morning.
The Turks did it to the Christian Greeks and Armenians.
The Soviets did it to the "Kulaks."
The Germans did it to the Jews.
The Chinese did it to the "landlords."
Now the American left is scapegoating white, male, consrvative Christian gun owners.
The "bitter clingers" who are standing in the way of the left's latest socialist utopian schemes. We have seen this nightmare before.
Let’s face it, we are the new Jews and Gypsies.” B-(
Nutty professor looks deranged
Mark
Eight professors have joined together to issue a statement in support of University of Rhode Island assistant professor Erik Loomis, who last week tweeted that he wanted NRA executive vice president ”Wayne LaPierre’s head on a stick.”
The authors of the statement, posted on the blog Crooked Timber, defend Loomis’ tweet as an example of metaphor and say their defense was “pulled together on an emergency basis” — perhaps explaining why distinguished academics would cite the Urban Dictionary as their source in explaining what “head on a stick” means, as well as their omission of his retweets of other violent metaphors wishing for those who support arming teachers to be “beaten to death” and Dick Morris to be hunted down and skinned for breakfast.
Nevertheless, Loomis has found defenders in academia, who worry that “his lack of tenure makes him vulnerable,” a state of affairs the rest of us who don’t enjoy the defense of “academic freedom” — that is, ”scholars’ freedom independently to express views (even intemperate ones) on topics of public importance” — face every day while arguing our beliefs in the public sphere. The fact that Loomis’ tweets seemingly had nothing to do with his teaching or his field of study further stretches the idea that academics should enjoy special protection from criticism. Meanwhile, the authors of Loomis’ defense call on university administrators to “affirm … the protections of the First Amendment” while overlooking a call for the head of a proponent of the Second Amendment.
We at Twitchy wish harm on no one, but Loomis’ public tweets and retweets were enough to elicit a statement from the University of Rhode Island distancing the school from them. Supporters who made no mention of the ugliness of Loomis’ Twitter activity were quick to call the criticism of Loomis an “ugly, vindictive witch hunt.”
Pot meet kettle, Professor Loomis. When the heat in the kitchen gets a little too warm the pricks start whining about witch hunts they a started!
“Can we now shoot the #NRA and everyone who defends them?”
******
Yes you can but don’t use a gun. Those are really bad.../sarc on big time
No, Michelle, the "sins" here are not those of the killer -- they couldn't care less about him.
The "sin" is our standing up to these bullyragging haters and telling them to eff off -- and making it stick. They hate that, they hate losing an issue, and they hate us.
NRA members arm themselves, so they will likely not be killed by gun criminals. It seems to me that we who are of the so-called “gun culture” outlive liberals who hate guns; they end up killed by robbers and muggers while we won’t just sit by and let bad things happen.