Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stormdog

They have a monopoly on the LEGAL USE of violence.
They cannot be allowed to have a blanket monopoly on the use of violence.


34 posted on 12/19/2012 9:13:15 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

“They have a monopoly on the LEGAL USE of violence.
They cannot be allowed to have a blanket monopoly on the use of violence.”

Presently they do not have a monopoly on the legal use of violence. They share it with us. They may try and define the terms, but it is shared never the less. This is what this whole thing is about. They want to create the monopoly.
And if that comes to pass, God help us.


39 posted on 12/19/2012 9:37:47 AM PST by Stormdog (A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: MrB

They do not have a monopoly on the legal use of violence. Some may have been trying to take it away with, for instance, the Zimmerman case. But self-defense is still our paramount right.


45 posted on 12/19/2012 10:17:38 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson