Posted on 12/18/2012 5:18:18 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
I'm in New England this week, and this afternoon caught Ann Coulter on the Howie Carr show. She spoke of the amazing ignorance of liberals when it comes to firearms. Just a couple of hours later, Chris Matthews provided a perfect case in point.
On this evening's Hardball, speaking with Illinois Dem Senator Dick Durbin, Matthews proposed that Congress "outlaw" semi-automatic weapons. Does he not realize that doing so would render illegal virtually every hunting rifle in production? View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Like this?
Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in 2010 Extolled the Virtues of Guns: I Carried a Gun Every Place I Went. . . But for Me, Guns are More than That (about Self-Defense) Video 2010
O Riley is back on it again with Stossel who has trouble with the definition of a semi-automatic.
OR replies,
“the FBI would define”. “How can Connecticut say they have tough gun laws when one can buy an AR-15 “.
“They are selling more of these guns than ever. I do not feel I need a n AR-15. If the govt takes over, your AR will not do you any good, they will just take it from you!””
“...and Krauthammer agreed.”
That surprised and disappointed me.
What guns aren’t semi-automatic?
Outlawed!
It’s kind of hard to argue with irrational lunatics. Particularly ones who are just looking for the first excuse to rant about guns.
Bill doesn’t have a need for anything. He is part of the protected class. Bill O’Reilly is bullshit 101.
Revolvers and fully automatic.
I can assure Mr. O’Reilly that there are plenty of AR-15 type rifles in the hands of criminals and felons, and that they are not going to register them with the FBI.
Fox Beltway types are not going to cross Murdock.
Pumps, lever action...
Now you can understand how the idiocy of Prohibition got started...with washerwomen like Chris Matthews.
I wish he would take a course in statistics and learn that it is more dangerous for a child to have a home with a swimming pool than with a gun. Should we ban pools? Why does someone need a pool? You can certainly live without it. Take a damn shower instead and let the children live.
Break actions, muzzle loaders, other single shots...
The odds are still better of getting struck by lightning then be shot at school. They don’t understand statistics - they are completely at the mercy of their childlike emotions. Yet they want to change the Constitution and take away rights - and still not guarantee safety.
I scoffed out loud when I heard Oreally say the AR-15 was a heavy weapon. Even my wife knows more than that and she doesn’t know anything about weapons of any kind.
Outlaw liberals. Send ‘em to HELL !
1. He doesn't know because he has $#!^ for brains.
2. He doesn't care because he's an America and Constitution hating Commie F#%k.
3. It's not about hunting, it's not even about resisting a tyrannical Gubbmint (cause I'm not gonna spend close to $1k for a semi-auto look alike when I can blow up a bridge/convoy/train/etc and get a crapload of the real McCoy should the time come).....
It's about the F'n CONSTITUTION!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.