Looks like Obama wanted a disaster to happen. Hmmmmm
1 posted on
12/18/2012 8:47:58 AM PST by
aimhigh
To: aimhigh
Of course he cut down on gun prosecutions — it would have wiped out most of his justice department.
To: aimhigh
Conclusion.
Wayne LaPierre - I’ve come to believe he (Clinton) needs a certain level of violence in this country. He is willing to accept a certain level of killing to further his political agenda.
3 posted on
12/18/2012 8:55:01 AM PST by
Red Steel
To: aimhigh
They have just been waiting for a disaster like this for an excuse to make more gun laws.
The left has planned this for a long time, they know what the answer is even before all the facts are in.
The fact that legally owned guns (by his mother) fell into the wrong hands must make them drool.
Why existing gun laws are not enforced? Could there be an <ahem> "racial inbalance" if they did?
4 posted on
12/18/2012 8:59:18 AM PST by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: aimhigh
...since Holder “is not going to prosecute” his homies, this shouldn’t be a surprise
5 posted on
12/18/2012 8:59:36 AM PST by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: aimhigh
What is this “extends to hand guns”? I missed this one.
6 posted on
12/18/2012 9:01:03 AM PST by
Rannug
("God has given it to me, let him who touches it beware.")
To: aimhigh
Give me a friggin break. Perhaps Pres. Bush prosecuted too many people.
7 posted on
12/18/2012 9:08:09 AM PST by
Theoria
(Romney is a Pyrrhic victory.)
To: aimhigh
Holder hasn’t been prosecuting gun violations among urban blacks.
9 posted on
12/18/2012 9:16:42 AM PST by
pallis
To: aimhigh
Holder’s people will not be prosecuted.
To: aimhigh
I remember prosecutions dropping significantly with AG Reno during the Clinton years as well. Interesting.
17 posted on
12/18/2012 12:58:08 PM PST by
MachIV
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson