Reread my post commenting on #5. Do you not agree the poster of 5 is FOS.
regarding “The original accuser had alleged sexual assault and ongoing harassment over a period of years”, clearly the hairdresser was complicit in not terminating services to the Senator immediately.
It depends on the meaning of
FOS. In my lexicon, he is not
FOS, only PCS (Partially Containing Sh!t.) The Senator is alleged to have sexaully assaulted a woman who continued to see him. I don't know if English even has a word for that level of idiocy, but "complicity" is not the one I'd choose. Since the allegations never led to an indictment or conviction, I would not call him a rapist any more than I would call Bill Clinton a rapist based on Juanita Broaddrick's testimony.
They are both alleged rapists.