Posted on 12/16/2012 2:21:08 PM PST by jazusamo
With President Obama poised to decide whether to allow construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline -- based on a second, more environmentally-sensitive path -- critics now appear focused on derailing the project over a climate change study.
TransCanada Corp. submitted a revised application after the president rejected the first one in January because it took the 1,700-mile-long pipeline across an aquifer in Nebraska.
However, environmental groups say producing oil from Alberta tar sands releases more carbon dioxide than conventional drilling, which would increase global warming, and that studies on the first application were inadequate.
Jeremy Symons, of the National Wildlife Federation, said Sunday the original assessment by the State Department underestimated the amount of greenhouse gas. And he called on the Environmental Protection Agency to do a more complete assessment on the second application.
We need an honest reassessment, and its up to the president to look at all environmental impacts, he told FoxNews.com.
Symons also suggested the State Department ducked the greenhouse emissions issue to avoid the politically sensitive debate about climate change.
The pipeline would transport the oil from Canada and Western states to Gulf Coast refiners.
Supporters argue the project would help the United State lessen its dependency on foreign oil, create thousands of construction jobs and that it has already passed the environmental test.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Why does Obama have the say in this?
He seems to have more of an affinity for government labor unions [SEIU.] I mean, he threw the coal miners' unions under the bus before he was elected. I think his hatred of business and fossil fuel trumps even his support for union labor.
Keystone XL: K.I.A. 11/06/12. RIP
Let’s give them an ultimatum...open the pipeline or each and every one of us prepares and consumes a gallon of firehouse chili.
The resultant rise of greenhouse gases...methane predominantly...will (supposedly) cause the oceans to flood, set adrift their precious polar bears, and flood the socialist strongholds in California, and the East Coast.
A brief earth-burp of carbon dioxide or a nation-wide fart of doom? The choice, gentlemen, is yours.
The oil can move but only in one of Buffet’s tanker cars.... /sarc
“Obama is determined that this oil goes to Red China. So be it.”
Heck, he could have done that with Iraqi oil.
My Global Warming Study for the Lake Champlain Basin. NY
“Lake Champlain smelt fishermen
who are wailing over lack of ice for
their shanties and indulging in other
piscatorial gnashing of teeth, can take
new heart.
There’s still plenty of time for
King Winter to get in his frigid licks,
and there have been only six years in
recorded history covering a period
of 120 years on Lake Champlain,
that the lake remained open [NOT FROZEN]. That
was in 1828, 1842, 1850, 1919, 1932
and 1933”
Chinas Oil Quest Comes to Iraq
http://thediplomat.com/2012/12/02/china-introducing-the-middle-easts-future-hegemon/
I remember the predictions of doom and gloom from the enviros on the Trans Alaska Pipeline also and all their points have been proven wrong.
Now we have newer and better technology and a proven track record in the lower 48 and they come back with the same doom and gloom, it's time to get the job done.
You understand that logic, clear ratonales and demonstrated experience have no place in an environmental discussion.
The left doesn't understand those kinds of arguments.
I'm serious.
Man does not control earth’s climate. The sun controls earth’s climate. What is so hard to understand about that?
Tee-totally eleminate the Dept. of Energy. It has failed its mission in every conceivable way.
I cannot see how you could possibly have posted a more stupid, retarded comment than the one you just posted.
Modern day Luddites
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.