Life can not exist without risk.
In order for a free society to exist, it must except the possibility bad thing can and will happen.
Every attempt to remove risk from our life limits our choices and our freedom.
Logic would dictate that by the very definition of “criminal”, those that have the mind set to commit this type of crime is not going to be stopped by “stronger gun laws”.
After all, murder is already against the law, and that does not stop those that kill other people.
But those that advocate for more and stronger gun laws fall into two categories. One, those who logic does not apply, only feelings. They fell it will do some good so then it must be good. These are the foot soldiers of the other group that are advocating more and stronger gun laws.
These are the one that want power and control over the rest of us. Most on the left fall into this category. They are really afraid of those with guns.
Gun laws have not stopped criminals from getting and using guns, they have only disarmed innocent citizens and left them unable to protect themselves.
In both Connecticut and Oregon, the guns were stolen by 20 year olds. A clear failure to properly lock up the guns. I’m curious if the Newtown mom bought the guns for her ‘autistic’ son. In both cases, the kids came from broken homes.
- posession of a hand gun without a permit
- posession of a firearm on school property.