And you can refute instead of instead of eliminating two crucial supporting sentences led by subordinate and coordinate conjunctions (that’s how grown-ups connect thoughts), and then reversing the order of the remaining sentences to obscure the meaning of a perfectly coherent paragraph.
You first stated you didn't understand the article.
Next you agreed with the entire premise of the article.
Lastly, you attempted to set up a “straw man argument” to dispute the findings of the article.
Your coherence is not in question. It is clearly lacking.
You ability to use reason to communicate a rational opinion....is also no longer in question.
I don't need to address your “straw man argument” as it applies to this topic.
I just need to point it out. Which I did.
Have a nice day!