You first stated you didn't understand the article.
Next you agreed with the entire premise of the article.
Lastly, you attempted to set up a “straw man argument” to dispute the findings of the article.
Your coherence is not in question. It is clearly lacking.
You ability to use reason to communicate a rational opinion....is also no longer in question.
I don't need to address your “straw man argument” as it applies to this topic.
I just need to point it out. Which I did.
Have a nice day!
Um... one doesn’t “use reason to communicate,” Miss Doolittle. One reasons. Then one communicates the fruits of one’s reasoning.
Now, please stop with the high-falutin’ pseudo polemics before you embarrass yourself further. Professor Higgins rang for tea.