If it is true the couple filed for joint divorce, or either filed for divorce, it is a matter of public record in the courts. No one’s birth certificate or college or military or SS records are matters of public record unless brought up i a suit in which case they would still be sealed.
But when the SOS of AZ asks for a verification of the basic birth facts (gender, date, city, island, mom’s name, and dad’s name) and the HI state registrar cannot verify ANY of those facts.... and also cannot verify that an alleged copy of the birth certificate presented by the alleged POTUS in a press conference at the White House is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”.... that is a legal and public disclosure that a forgery has been passed off to the public to hide that there is no legally-valid birth record in Hawaii - no legally-determined birth facts and thus no way for anybody to LAWFULLY say that he is eligible.
And THAT is news-worthy, don’t you think? The legal question has been answered: He CANNOT be certified as eligible to be POTUS. Why won’t the media report the truth about this?