Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Fabulous"
1 posted on 12/11/2012 10:00:34 AM PST by edcoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: edcoil

Uh, because they LIKE to put it there?


2 posted on 12/11/2012 10:01:15 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (BOHICA eGOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Now I support abortion!


3 posted on 12/11/2012 10:03:07 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (Greed + Envy = Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

This theory will have a sell-by date of 90 days.

We get less wise every minute.


4 posted on 12/11/2012 10:03:13 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Yeah like “NO-FAULT” Divorce(break-up of the REAL Family), AND SLUT “Single” “Mothers” “raising” BASTARD “Sons” and Daughters.


5 posted on 12/11/2012 10:03:41 AM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

;D!


6 posted on 12/11/2012 10:04:00 AM PST by poobear (Socialism, in the minds of the elites, is a con-game for the serfs, nothing more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

So in order to prevent further gay people being produced, we should just take children away from their parents and let the state raise them...unless it’s a really gay state.


7 posted on 12/11/2012 10:04:39 AM PST by stuartcr ("Everything happens as God wants it to, otherwise, things would be different.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Does this explain why so many female couples adopt boys?


8 posted on 12/11/2012 10:04:56 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Because they are disgusting perverts ?


9 posted on 12/11/2012 10:05:10 AM PST by clamper1797 (I mourn for the America I grew up in ..fought for ..and loved ..July 4 1776- June 28 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

“Though scientists have long suspected some sort of genetic link, Rice says studies attempting to explain why people are gay have been few and far between.”

then this fag article is a waste of time then? I don’t need an explanation why degenerates are degenerates.


10 posted on 12/11/2012 10:05:31 AM PST by max americana (Make the world a better place by punching a liberal in the face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil
Apparently, Lindsey Graham's mother really liked show tunes...
11 posted on 12/11/2012 10:06:37 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (Cogito, ergo armatum sum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

“Evolutionarily speaking, if homosexuality was solely a genetic trait, scientists would expect the trait to eventually disappear because homosexuals wouldn’t be expected to reproduce.”

How about stupidity? Oh well, I guess the last election demonstrates it doesn’t interfer with reproduction.


13 posted on 12/11/2012 10:07:46 AM PST by ZULU (See video: http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-first-siege-of-vienna.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil
Scientists may have finally solved the puzzle of what makes a person gay

I don't know about past eras, but currently I'd say it was Justin Bieber music.

14 posted on 12/11/2012 10:07:52 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Scientists looking for more grant money!! I believe these scientists counter each other for that very reason...MONEY.


15 posted on 12/11/2012 10:08:01 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

17 posted on 12/11/2012 10:08:51 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil
“faBulouS”

As in BS. The article is so contorted in logic that it is more like a pretzel than a scholarly report.

18 posted on 12/11/2012 10:08:58 AM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

“The results, published online this month in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, confirm earlier findings that identical twins are more concordant for same-sex behaviors than fraternal twins are but only modestly so: In men, genetic effects appeared to explain 34% to 39% of the differences between the two twin groups, whereas in women, genetics accounted for only about 18% to 19% of the difference—a finding consistent with other research showing that sexual orientation in women is not as rigidly determined as it is in men.”

http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2008/06/30-01.html

So, the other 61-66% of gay twins seem to have picked up homosexuality by some other method, like RECRUITMENT.

I don’t doubt that some people are born gay, and that some are also recruited. Gay mens’ predilection for youth is well known since the Greeks at least.


20 posted on 12/11/2012 10:09:43 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (BOHICA eGOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

So fathers who love their wives will pass along their love of women to their daughters while mothers who love their husbands pass along their love of men to their sons?

GTFO! Homosexuality is a LEARNED behavior. It’s not natural. From a purely animal standpoint, the propagation of the species does not exist between same-sex couples. Humans along with primates and dolphins have sex for both procreation and pleasure. This is purely about “pleasure” for hedonists and sickos who had bad childhoods or were otherwise raised improperly.

If it turns out that they do legitimately find a “gay gene,” it will be an aberration in the human genome much like balding, red hair, or left-handedness, IMO.


22 posted on 12/11/2012 10:09:59 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

So, they are saying they have a “gay” gene?

I know the homosexual lobby has been chasing this for a while, because in their world, it means you are not responsible for your sexual orientation any more than you are responsible for the pigmentation in your skin.

Which, to them, means they cannot be judged on it because they are the same as someone born with a genetic handicap or various skin colors.

They are trying to extend this to many facets of life, including (or especially) crime. You aren’t responsible. It is in your genes.


26 posted on 12/11/2012 10:11:05 AM PST by rlmorel (1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Let me guess. Because they were molested by a pedophile? That cause will never be looked into by “scientists”.


27 posted on 12/11/2012 10:11:06 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil
Scientists May Have Finally Unlocked Puzzle of Why People Are Gay

"THAT is one big pile of....."


29 posted on 12/11/2012 10:11:22 AM PST by massmike (At least no one is wearing a "Ron Paul - 2016" tee shirt........yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson