Posted on 12/10/2012 5:50:12 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
The possibility that LENR is fraudulent, or a result of error is now non-existent, and "the ducks are coming home to roost".
For those of you interested in an in-depth discussion of the science in language a layman can understand, but with sufficient depth to be convincing to the dedicated scientist, this book:
is excellent.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IwamuraYobservatiob.pdf
Link to the Mitsubishi research.
It should also be noted that the Toshiba work was reported at a meeting of the American NUCLEAR Society.
Academia is full of pc nonthinkers
Bookmark.
Or so they say.
The possibility that LENR is fraudulent, or a result of error is now non-existent,
The possibility that LENR is fraudulent, or a result of error is now exactly the same as it was before. UNTIL this is PUBLICALLY DEMONSTRATED it still just remains CLAIMS.
. . . and while claiming moral and intellectual superiority to the masses, they have reverted to a base human characteristic . . . the self-righteous ba$tards are greedy and selfish . . . they are on the take
It is amazing that the global warming pseudo science gained wide acceptance despite strong evidence it does not exist and was based on manipulated data, while “ cold fusion” has far more credible research supporting it and has not been taken seriously.
they are wine swishing morons feeding at the public trough
You had me until this.
Andrea Rossi is a complete fraud.
It doesn’t inspire confidence when nuclear physicists mis-spell spell “length” in one of their figures.
Easy to answer, cheap energy bad, and must be discouraged, expensive unreliable energy good and must be encouraged. Left wing cronies get nothing out of it.
mis-spell spell? Damn it.
Uh, the criterion for validity is replication, which has been done, and in the case of Mitsubishi, published. "Public demonstration" has precisely nothing to do with science.
And I'm sure you'll also come up with some reason to ignore Celani's results, which HAVE been "publically demonstrated" multiple times.
Skeptopath thinking.
So, the mere appearance of the word "Rossi" makes all the other facts inadmissable?? That attitude sounds like pathological skepticism to me.
“The possibility that LENR is fraudulent...” - WW
The probability of fraud the same as it was. Check your logic.
Since some stock certificates are true and valid, are all stock certificates true and valid?
If presented with a stock certificate from BNY Mellon, do you treat it with the same precaution as you would from one claimed to be found in grandma’s safe? How would you treat one presented from a convicted forger?
The scientific process and search for truth is about independent verification. Trust nobody. Instead get their procedures and replicate the findings.
LOL. MOST physicists can't spell for sour apples, and in this case you're also talking about "English as a second language", as the speaker is Japanese.
All of which is irrelevant to the FACT of replication, by solid researchers at world-class organizations.
Too funny. Karma.
>> For those of you interested in an in-depth discussion
Yeah, “in depth discussion” is the ONLY thing the LENR “industry” has produced. With a liberal amount of whining as a by-product.
I’m not interested in “in depth discussion”. Won’t heat or cool my house.
Got power?
My logic is just fine. Note "LENR" as the broad class. That there may be some individuals practicing fraud within that broad class is not what I'm referring to.
According the the hot physicists, ALL LENR research is either fraudulent or mistaken. That position is now untenable by any measure.
"The scientific process and search for truth is about independent verification. Trust nobody. Instead get their procedures and replicate the findings."
Which is precisely what has been done, and what the article refers to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.