Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/09/2012 4:20:31 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Every state in the union should be like this.


2 posted on 12/09/2012 4:22:49 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I don’t feel the Electoral College right now is a fair system.

This really isn't about the electoral college but I would like to see Michigan give its votes by district.
3 posted on 12/09/2012 4:24:41 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I believe I like the idea of making the Electoral Votes dictated by the voting per Congressional district, with +2 going to the overall popular vote winner within a state. Not to mention, it will marginalize any effects of voter fraud, should there be any.

lol It will make campaigning somewhat of a nightmare, but will be best for the voters I think. For instance, a democrat presidential candidate wouldn’t spend 5 minutes in South Carolina during the general election campaign, but they would almost need to now if there is a CD within the state that could go their way. Same thing as it relates to Republicans with California or New York.

It will maintain the spirit of Federalism, would be a good middle ground between the traditional system we have now and the demands on the part of liberals for a national popular vote deciding elections, and I believe our Founders would approve!


4 posted on 12/09/2012 4:42:47 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

If the RINOs can’t win through principles and issues then make it so you can win by changing the rules.


5 posted on 12/09/2012 4:53:32 PM PST by napscoordinator (GOP Candidate 2020 - "Bloomberg 2020 - We vote for whatever crap the GOP puts in front of us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

bookmark


7 posted on 12/09/2012 5:04:56 PM PST by pepperdog ( I still get a thrill up my leg when spell check doesn't recognize the name/word Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is the ONLY way to overcome the Inner-city parasitic tribal votes and associated Vote Fraud. You can’t outvote the dead, Illegals, and black multi-voters.


8 posted on 12/09/2012 5:05:15 PM PST by traditional1 (Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Every battleground state with a GOP Governor and Legislature should pass this kind of law as soon as possible.


9 posted on 12/09/2012 5:13:59 PM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I used to not like this idea, because the libs proposed it, but now that the GOP has many state houses and governorships, it’s time to do it. A more proportional representation is good for the Red states.


10 posted on 12/09/2012 5:36:53 PM PST by 11th_VA (Keep your laws OFF my Big Gulp !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This should be done immediately. The cities have begun to overwhelm the rest of the electorate to the point where they are losing their representation within the quadrennial “assembly” that is the electoral college.


11 posted on 12/09/2012 5:38:15 PM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Sounds good to me. Better than the bull**** “popular vote” crap being pushed by the liberals.


12 posted on 12/09/2012 5:39:31 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Yes, big city urban sponges are killing America. They are disproportionately voting in their favor and more rural areas are getting hosed. The only thing that would be better would be 1 state = 1 vote.


15 posted on 12/09/2012 6:17:26 PM PST by vpintheak (Occupy your Brain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is a great idea for Ohio. There is far too much clout in the major metro areas (Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati, Dayton), and all of that clout is on the side of the socialists, voted by the entitlement class.
Proportional allotment would be a great way to get some voice back to the conservative districts.


17 posted on 12/09/2012 6:37:22 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Still seeking change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This would make Ohio irrelevant in national elections ... GOOD!


19 posted on 12/09/2012 7:49:57 PM PST by Mike Darancette (I don't understand why the Boomers are so passive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Conservatives need this to happen in CA and NY ASAP.


20 posted on 12/09/2012 7:55:09 PM PST by CriticalJ (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I figured this out early during the year: if the Republican-controlled Purple States (FL, IA, MI, OH, PA, VA and WI) shift to the Maine-Nebraska Method, Mitt Romney would be a cinch to win. Sure enough, if they had, he would have been.

Here’s the deal (Michael Barone pointed this out when explaining why Obama was re-elected while the Republicans kept the House): Democrats are much more concentrated in inner city districts. Republicans are more evenly spread out in the suburbs, towns and rural areas of the country. Democrats win lots of districts with 75 percent or more the vote. We win many more districts with 55 to 65 percent of the vote.

As it is, vote fraud and voter intimidation is rift in the inner cities of the country. When that tips the balance in big states, it can be devastating to democracy.


22 posted on 12/09/2012 8:02:55 PM PST by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I have been a fan of this idea for several years now, and would love to see all 50 states allocate their votes this way. It keeps any state from attaining excess importance, and keeps the cities from necessarily overwhelming their neighbors in the rest of their respective states. Also, the decentralization makes vote fraud that much more difficult to accomplish to any real effect. Outstanding idea, and I truly hope it catches on across the US!


23 posted on 12/09/2012 8:23:27 PM PST by VRWCer ( They will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. - ML King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

bump


29 posted on 12/10/2012 12:17:41 AM PST by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Mad Dawg; EDINVA; JPG; Hawthorn; Paisan; ConservativeOrBust; VA_Gentleman; ..

Virginia Ping! If you want on or off the Virginia Ping List, please freepmail me.

32 posted on 12/10/2012 5:36:31 AM PST by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson