Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhilCollins; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy

I am inclined to dismiss Roemer out of hand. His fetish for not raising money is a non-starter. And I question his name recognition, he was Governor a long time ago and his White House run was small and barely noticed, he got 1% in the LA primary.


10 posted on 12/14/2012 2:34:25 AM PST by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Impy

Simply put, Roemer is pro-abort and hasn’t won office since 1987.


12 posted on 12/14/2012 3:19:46 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Impy; PhilCollins; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy

“his White House run was small and barely noticed, he got 1% in the LA primary”


By far the best performance by Buddy Roemer in a GOP presidential primary was in Puerto Rico, over a month after Roemer left the GOP to run under some newfangled “moderate” party (the mere fact that Roemer is no longer a Republican should make him a non-starter for the Senate seat); since he still was a candidate when the PR Secretary of State approved the ballot, he wasn’t kicked off. As you may recall, Roemer finished in third place in Puerto Rico—ahead of both Gingrich and Ron Paul—with close to 2.5% of the vote (almost 3,000 votes), and actually beat out Santorum for second place in four precincts.

How could that be possible? The GOP establishment in PR, from Governor Fortuño on down, was 100% behind Romney, and Romney’s list of delegates included the Senate president, the Speaker of the House, the Mayor of San Juan, the Governor’s Chief of Staff, etc., while the Santorum delegates included the likes of me. Well, political leaders down to the ward level had been instructed to tell people that they had to vote for Romney (which is why he beat out Santorum by like 85% to 8%), but I don’t think they did a very good job with a couple of thousand of voters, since they looked at the ballot, saw the name Buddy Roemer listed first (the order is randomly selected, and candidates appear from left to right on the top of the page), and thought “that must be the Romney guy I have to vote for” and marked an X under Roemer. This was particularly embarrassing given that (i) there were no delegates listed under Roemer’s name, while all those bigshots were listed under Romney’s name and (ii) there was a freaking picture of each candidate above his name. Here’s the ballot: http://209.68.12.238/Primarias2012Rep/docs/PapeletaModelo.pdf


16 posted on 12/14/2012 6:26:21 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson