I don’t see where your reply has anything to do with this situation as Hillman clearly has mental problems, so he’s not a wolf. As far as the officer’s act being “Opportunity Costs”, show me the evidence that would prove your claim? And if you are basing your claim on just your ‘suspicions’ are you not reinforcing the point of my post? And when did we become a nation wherein one person’s ‘suspicions’ where enough to condemn a man’s act? Isn’t condemning people without proof a tactic of the ‘Leftist’?
How do you know he has mental problems? Have you examined and diagnosed him? You want me to prove Opportunity Costs to you? That’s like asking someone to prove the sun is shining. It makes no sense. Would the policeman have done more good by giving his $100 to the Salvation Army? Yes. The stories say this fellow lives in an apartment, so he’s not homeless. It’s hard for people when they realize they have been victims of a Con Game. The Grifters count on that guilt. Many Con Games are never reported because people are ashamed of being taken.