Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How A Legal Technicality Could Unravel Obamacare
Business Insider ^ | Dec 3 2012 | Lucas Kawa

Posted on 12/03/2012 11:24:59 AM PST by WilliamIII

Obamacare supporters rejoiced in June when the Supreme Court ruled the U.S. could use its taxing authority to mandate that most people buy health insurance.

But their celebrations may have been a bit premature.

The Affordable Care Act faces other legal hurdles—including a challenge that only could have been made after the Supreme Court’s ruling.

The right-leaning Pacific Legal Foundation amended its challenge to the ACA after the Supreme Court upheld the insurance mandate under Congress’ taxing powers.

The group's challenge turns on the Origination Clause in the U.S. Constitution, which requires that bills for raising revenue start in the House of Representatives.

Problem is, the group argues, Obamacare started in the Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS: aca; affordablecareact; obamacare; originationclause; senate; supremecourt; unaffordablecareact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

I have become convinced that Roberts was in some way coerced to change his position. Either threatening him or his family. I have never believed that such things actually take place, especially at that high a level, but when you look at his orginal declarations during the case and in the original majority opinion he originally wrote, there is no other logical reason he would have decided to change his mind and use the circuitous reasoning he eventually used in his second majority opinion. It simply makes no sense. At first I just accepted that he was afraid his court would be viewed as too political and changed, but even if he did have that change of heart, his decision would not have been such a mess.


41 posted on 12/03/2012 12:30:01 PM PST by ilgipper (Obama supporters are comprised of the uninformed & the ill-informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
The group's challenge turns on the Origination Clause in the U.S. Constitution, which requires that bills for raising revenue start in the House of Representatives. Problem is, the group argues, Obamacare started in the Senate.

Well......duh!?

FMCDH(BITS).....see tagline.

42 posted on 12/03/2012 12:41:07 PM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Roberts already made it crystal clear that he will uphold Obamacare based on politics, not law. Unless he has somehow changed his mind in the interim, this is a waste of time.


43 posted on 12/03/2012 12:44:03 PM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

it’s getting clearer by the day that it’s just a question of time before the SHTF and the people will take back DC. Once that happens it would do to amend the Constitution so all elected officials can not exclude themselves from any laws they pass. They get no special treatment or perks in any way, period. All newly proposed legislation before voted upon would have to first pass Constitutional scrutiny.


44 posted on 12/03/2012 12:45:26 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Going nowhere


45 posted on 12/03/2012 12:49:46 PM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
The real issue here seems to me to be that it is impossible for HHS to issue waivers to something that has been declared a tax. Any type of exemptions to taxes must be written into the tax code. Perhaps I'm missing something but I don't understand why few have seen what appears to be an obvious oversight. If they declare all of the waivers issued null and void, ObamaCare will be repealed tomorrow.
46 posted on 12/03/2012 12:57:28 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Duh!!! That’s why Roberts let it pass. That’s how it is supposed to work


47 posted on 12/03/2012 1:00:50 PM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

I do not trust this Supreme Court to rule the right way a second time, considering they blew it the first time.


48 posted on 12/03/2012 1:45:02 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Prediction: John Roberts will decide to rule that for purposes of this bill the Senate is actually the House.
Problem solved.


49 posted on 12/03/2012 1:50:07 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

As I recall, this was discussed earlier and the Senate took an existing House effort and turned it into Obama Care. It did originate in the House as I recall


50 posted on 12/03/2012 1:55:32 PM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Surely you don’t expect the Supreme Court to actually uphold the language and intent of the Constitution??!!!
Roberts has already proven that to be nonsense!


51 posted on 12/03/2012 1:55:46 PM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
Re: “Technicality Could Unravel Obamacare”

Only if the Supreme Court actually reads the Constitution.

52 posted on 12/03/2012 1:56:14 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
Oh don't worry, John Boner and Mitch McConnell are feverishly working to make sure that there are no problems whatsoever with the implementation of ObamaCare.

The Republican leadership are so F-ing stupid!

53 posted on 12/03/2012 2:05:24 PM PST by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skepolitic

Suitable place to bump this thread. Unfortunately, you are right when you say the Constitution is a dead letter. It grieves me.


54 posted on 12/03/2012 2:39:36 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

This “technicality” is simply the law, and it’s been evident since the Supreme Court ruling.

Few noticed it because they were busy pitching fits instead of thinking.

By defining healthcare “penalties” as taxes, the Court rightly handed the issue back to Congress, which has the Constitutional power both to tax and to repeal taxes.

Read Roberts’ opinion. He basically said that it’s not the job of the Court to legislate or to undo legislators’ boneheaded laws. Not in those words, but that’s what he said.

Congress got us in this mess; we need to pressure them to get us out of it.


55 posted on 12/03/2012 3:57:34 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

“We do not consider whether the Act embodies sound policies. That judgment is entrusted to the nation’s elected leaders. We ask only whether Congress has the power under the Constitution to enact the challenged provisions.”

In other words, Congress has the legal power to enact stupid and harmful laws.

Excellent column here: Justice Roberts’ Extremely Conservative Obamacare Opinion

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-ladd/justice-roberts-obamacare_b_1637051.html


56 posted on 12/03/2012 4:03:35 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah; MinuteGal

“We do not consider whether the Act embodies sound policies. That judgment is entrusted to the nation’s elected leaders. We ask only whether Congress has the power under the Constitution to enact the challenged provisions.”
In other words, Congress has the legal power to enact stupid and harmful laws.”

Well, then I guess we don’t need a Supreme Court to interpret and/or rule on the constitutionality of stupid and harmful laws passed by Congress. The people have no final protection via the Court. The Supreme Court is thus superfluous; therefore, do away with it.


57 posted on 12/03/2012 5:18:41 PM PST by flaglady47 (When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

It is, strictly speaking, which it should be, the duty of the court to rule on whether or not a law or action is in keeping with our Constitution.

A law can be double-dumb and still be Constitutional. The Constitution is our blueprint, but it is no firewall against human stupidity.

We duly elected those lawmakers who passed Obamacare.The court merely said that they COULD lawfully pass a terrible piece of legislation, not whether they SHOULD have.

In other words, it’s not the job of the Court to save us from the wrongheadedness of those whom we elect to Congress.


58 posted on 12/03/2012 5:41:38 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

We have 4 members on the court who will vote to do the right thing, the thugs now have 5. Its basic math even 7 year old can understand.


59 posted on 12/03/2012 5:43:14 PM PST by DarkWaters ("Deception is a state of mind --- and the mind of the state" --- James Jesus Angleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

“Ordinary citizens have no standing to sue over such matters.”

The peasantry has no standing. Period.


60 posted on 12/03/2012 6:26:04 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Getting in touch with my inner rebel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson