[metmom]

You seem to vacillate wildly between the idea that nobody is arguing against the idea that the bacteria evolved antibiotic resistance and the idea that the variation that would confer resistance had to be there, created by God, from the beginning.

No, you misunderstand.

I am not saying it evolved antibiotic resistance. I'm saying it was already there and was expressed under the right conditions.

Do try to keep up and don't let your rabid disdain of non-evolutionary thought blind you so much. It's impeding your reading comprehension.

[MrB]

I don’t think he’ll get it.
It is contrary to his pre-suppositional framework.

[allmendream]

And the example of the citric acid metabolizing e.coli?

It was most certainly NOT “already there” and I am keeping up just fine, I didn't misunderstand you at all.

You say “evolution” but what you mean is that the variation was there from the beginning.

That is wrong. Demonstrably wrong. Hideously wrong. Such a supposition is not only ignorant; it is dangerous.

If the antibiotic resistance was “already there” then an infected person either has the resistant strain or they do not; and there is no danger that their sloppy compliance with taking their antibiotics will lead to antibiotic resistant arising in the population.

So can you read and understand the e.coli evidence you asked for? It is obvious you did not. But then again if you let evidence change your opinion; you wouldn't be a creationist.