Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michelle Obama’s Next Move (President? Supreme Court Justice?)
Newsweek ^ | December 3, 2012 | Allison Samuels

Posted on 12/02/2012 7:42:46 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Chatting with a group backstage on the set of Jimmy Kimmel Live! in October, Michelle Obama made it clear that she wasn’t thinking about what she might do in the future. “I’m just looking ahead to getting Barack back in office and continuing the work he’s been doing,” she said. “Supporting him is my focus.”

But others think the first lady—who spent the past four years seeking to better the lives of military families and fighting to end childhood obesity before becoming one of the stars of her husband’s reelection effort this fall—could have bigger things ahead of her, if she so chooses. “Michelle is Superwoman. What can’t she do?” Samuel L. Jackson recently told Newsweek. “That’s why people love her. She can be on the Supreme Court and anywhere else she wants. She can be the president. She’s history and she’ll stay history because she is so amazingly smart and together.”

Jackson isn’t the only person thinking along these lines. “I’d love to see her get more into politics because it would be a breath of fresh air in D.C.,” says Democratic Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina. “She’s honest and straightforward, which is not what you see in Washington much. She is exactly what we need around here.”(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; democrats; michelleobama; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Too bad that non-qualification is followed. The framers wanted all government positions open to all people, not the caste that went to law school.


81 posted on 12/03/2012 11:32:44 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I can't imagine anyone being qualified without some practical courtroom experience, say ten years or so.

Probably that was among the reasons Obama picked Elena Kagan.

The anti-nepotism law could prevent Obama from nominating Michelle for the Supreme Court...but she could run for President in 2016. No prior history of elective office is needed (Taft, Hoover, and Eisenhower didn't have any).

82 posted on 12/03/2012 4:01:42 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Plus Nixon sent Kerry to Cambodia in December 1968. President-elect Nixon.


83 posted on 12/03/2012 4:04:35 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

I agree.


84 posted on 12/04/2012 10:17:07 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Hurricane Sandy..., a week later and over 60 million Americans still didn't have power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: leapfrog0202

She was not disbarred. She voluntarily suspended her license because she wasn’t practicing law (not that she ever really did). Some lawyers do that so as to not have to keep up with continuing legal education courses. I don’t know where that rumor started, but I looked on the Illinois Bar website and it just isn’t true. Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.

Still, considering she never really practiced law, the SC is a bit of a stretch.


85 posted on 12/09/2012 3:39:48 PM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Harriet Myers would have been a judicial giant compared to a Michelle Obama nomination.


86 posted on 12/09/2012 3:41:56 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Thanks for clarifying that.


87 posted on 12/09/2012 4:45:48 PM PST by leapfrog0202 ("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson