State courts in Indiana and Georgia ruled that Obama is a natural born citizen. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that Obama is a natural born citizen. (I am talking here only about decisions on the merits, not the 100+ decisions throwing out eligibility suits on standing or other procedural grounds). The Supreme Court has declined to hear appeals from any of these cases, without a single recorded dissent. They are unlikely to ever agree to hear this issue unless there is a split of authority in the lower courts.
State courts in Indiana and Georgia ruled that Obama is a natural born citizen. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that Obama is a natural born citizen. (I am talking here only about decisions on the merits, not the 100+ decisions throwing out eligibility suits on standing or other procedural grounds).
Can you cite specifically when and what was the actual ruling? And, dismissing the case because of some phony “does not have standing” is not a ruling on the merits of a case
Also, any of these judges subpeona and VIEW the official copy of Obama’s Hawaii Birth Certificate? And, not the two fake ones Obama’s people have produced
Last time I checked there has been ZERO rulings and decisions based on Obama being eligible or Natural Born.
Unfortunately, there are way too many Obama Supporters on FR, and not enough pro-Eligibility people.
The state court in Indiana did NOT rule that Obama is a natural-born citizen. The "court" that "ruled" on Obama in Georgia was an administrative law judge who based his "opinion" on the Indiana decision which never said Obama was a natural-born citizen along with an undocumented consideration that Obama was born in Hawaii. I'm pretty sure whatever U.S. court of appeals decision you're referring to is equally deficient in legal foundation.