Newt explains what the Republicans need to do to beat Obama

The Right Scoop ^ | 11/30/2012 | The Right Scoop via Fox News

[sheikdetailfeather]

Forget last night’s interview. Newt was much better tonight on Hannity and laid out exactly what Republicans need to do and explained why they have much more power than they realize. The interview begins at the 4:00 mark.

[Timber Rattler]

You want to really belittle Jim Robinson on his forum buddy?

You know that you've lost the argument when you desperately try to bring the boss into it to try and stifle the discussion.

[Berlin_Freeper]

Hey I gave you 2009 video of Gingrich talking conservative ideals. By your own crazy boxed in position you lose.

Oh wait, you are going to be willfully blind by spamming Pelosi links that Gingrich said was a mistake?

Yea, you are. LoL!

[Timber Rattler]

Unfortunately Romney plowed of Gingrich with negative ads. Were you paying attention?

Oh, it was all the negative ads fault that few people voted for Newt. Right? I guess that explains why Santorum won so many more primaries than him.

How about just maybe they saw through his facade and refused to vote for a con man. That seems to be more the case than anything Team Romney did.

[Berlin_Freeper]

You know that you've lost the argument when you desperately try to bring the boss into it to try and stifle the discussion.

Obviously you have no reply for Romney plowing over Gingrich with negative ads as the cause of him losing, which had absolutely noting to do with the FR poll.

You know you need to duck your pure crazy talk by playing the victim card.

[Berlin_Freeper]

Is supporting Santorum the chip on your shoulder against Gingrich?

Get over it. I could have taken either over Romney.

(btw I know you don’t notice these things but Romney plowed over Rick with negative ads in turn)

[Timber Rattler]

Oh wait, you are going to be willfully blind by spamming Pelosi links that Gingrich said was a mistake?

He made that video in April 2008. Newt didn't think it was a mistake until May 2011 when he decided that he wanted to run for President and needed Conservative votes.

[Berlin_Freeper]

I’ll take your word on it it, because you are the world expert on Pelosi/Gingrich. Took Gingrich three years to come around, took you many posts, expert that you are, to even acknowledge Gingrich changed his mind.

Who is the snake oil sales man again?

[Timber Rattler]

Is supporting Santorum the chip on your shoulder against Gingrich?

No, because Santorum was hardly perfect either, but he was a better candidate than Newt, which translated into actual votes and victories before Team Romney finally outspent him at the end.

And I've been following Team Romney's skullduggery ever since they first set their sights on Sarah Palin in September 2008, and so that argument doesn't fly either.

[Berlin_Freeper]

Well, “hardly perfect” is a far cry from how you draw Gingrich as nothing but a pure Evil liar on every single utterance he ever makes.

You should pause and think about that buddy.

[Timber Rattler]

Took Gingrich three years to come around, took you many posts, expert that you are, to even acknowledge Gingrich changed his mind.

I'm not acknowledging that he changed his mind at all because I don't think he didn't. He just had to reverse course politically because he knew that global warming was a toxic issue for Conservatives and that that video would be difficult to explain away in the coming primaries. And it was and still is.

In fact, Newt let his true feelings slip when he at first supported Obamacare and then mouthed off about "right wing social engineering." Of course, he conveniently changed his mind about those things too in very short order.

[Ditter]

I agree with what you saw on FR. I was neutral on Palin, didn't like her or dislike her, I didn't like Cain from the first minute he opened his mouth and I have admired Newt's intellect for years. I almost left FR over what I saw going on.

[Timber Rattler]

Well, “hardly perfect” is a far cry from how you draw Gingrich as nothing but a pure Evil liar on every single utterance he ever makes.

That's because he IS a hypocrite and a liar. It's been proven repeatedly (see links posted above), but folks like you still have your blinders on about him.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Gram is grammar.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Except when they win (e.g. GWB)

[Fightin Whitey]

Agreed.

Newt is a great speaker and messenger but the moment he gets close to power he starts to think and act like Chris Christie.

[Yosemitest]

GWB won because Conservatives bought the LIE the we should "Compromise our VALUES in order to start moving toward our goals."
Every time we COMPROMISE our values, we move deeper into DESTRUCTION.
NO MORE COMPROMISE!
NO MORE "Go along to get along."

[HiTech RedNeck]

You’re thoroughly patting yourself on the back for something; it’s not quite clear what as it appears to be shot through with self contradiction.

[Yosemitest]

I think you've been reading too much psychology, and are lost in the no common sense zone of its "There is no God" theology.
Self-contradictions ? Maybe a few, such as voting for Romney at the last moment, when I said I wouldn't.
And I do believe there there was enough voter fraud by the"Obama-Nation" to steal 80 electoral college votes from Ohio, Virginia, Florida, and Pennsylvania.
But patting myself on the back? I find no satisfaction in stating the obvious.
"Establishment Republicans" lose. It's just that simple.
They're more Democrat, than they are Republican, and they're a curse on the GOP.
If that's where they want to take the Republican Party, then I'm not going, and neither is 64% of the Republican voters.